Talk:Jackson and His Computerband
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jackson and His Computerband article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Tone and cleanup
[edit]Hey, I know it's not the usual Wikipedia dull entry, but this guy who put this in knows what's up. I say don't change it. Music reviews used to be really cool, you know, something the listener could read and relate to. Instead now we have this ULTRA-pretentious crap made by these ULTRA-nerdy English majors who for sure don't know how to dance or have fun in general. So we get these horrible phrases like "Smiths-esque" or "head-food album" or "teen pop that's as nourishing as an oil rag and rappers yelling like angry landlords over Mattel beats," god guys, it's music, you know, not a Shakespeare writing assignment. Here's what WAY more music reviews should be like - [1] anyway, I'm Nathan and I like this article just how it is. And NO I didn't originally write it, but props to who did.
- This is an encyclopedia, not a press release for a record label or a flyer for a danceclub. Where do you expect ultra-nerdy English majors to write?
- As it is now, the article seems to have been written by the artist or one of his friends, or some PR person for his label. It needs major NPOV work. Don't like the encyclopedic tone? Go read Rolling Stone instead of an encyclopedia. Kwertii 22:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Good point Kwertii, I guess you're right. This is an encyclopedia. Nathan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.32.245.125 (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jackson and His Computerband. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090614115243/http://warp.net/records/jackson-and-his-computer-band to http://warp.net/records/jackson-and-his-computer-band
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)