Talk:Jack Turban/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Jack Turban. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Is this individual worthy of a Wikipedia page?
This article reads like a resume and advertisement. Should it be taken down? 73.17.143.115 (talk) 07:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- yes it should, he has only 50k followers in twitter. he's not even famous enough. 2804:1B3:7083:C57D:D95E:AF6E:D4BF:F221 (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
Why would you remove the citation to the conflict of interest? It's from the study's own disclosure? Readers should know that his research is funded through a grant from manufacturers of puberty blocker drugs. RaySmall88 RaySmall88 (talk) 03:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Per WP:NPOV, what "readers should know" is best decided based on what reliable, secondary sources focus on. One of the conflicts your edit included was not mentioned by the National Review source and should definitely not be included. For the rest, we're already affording the National Review piece as much weight as it merits by summarizing Levine's points. Further detail is undue. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Jack Turban included it himself in the disclosures of his study. It doesn't get any more reliable than that.
- "JLT received a pilot research award for general psychiatry residents from The American
- Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, supported by Industry Sponsors (Arbor and
- Pfizer),"
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357792124_Access_to_gender-affirming_hormones_during_adolescence_and_mental_health_outcomes_among_transgender_adults RaySmall88 (talk) 03:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with what Firefangledfeathers has said. The allegation from Levine was already included with the requisite weight based on its merits, and consensus about the National Review is that statements from it should be attributed. The other two citations; the AACAP Pilot Research Award press release, and (presumably) the funding excerpt from a January 2022 paper, when used in this manner constitute WP:SYNTH and original research, and would be not allowed in the article space. Sideswipe9th (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)