Talk:Jack Ohle

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

AFD

This article is inappropriate in its current form. ( See wp:oneevent ) Either other information must be added that makes him notable, or it should be deleted. If being married and having a kid made someone notable, we'd all have an article. If nobody adds additional information showing that Jack Ohle is notable outside of this controversy, then I will re-add the afd tag. Leafyplant 20:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the article is inappropriate. There may be some notability, but the article is only about a recent controversy - clearly a violation of WP:NPOV. snigbrook (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its current form is problematic because of how it started. But Ohle clearly meets WP:ACADEMIC (point 6) - which is why I spun if off, rather than deleting the material - and I'm sure a reasonable bio is possible. That may involve a lot of editing, including cutting. Disembrangler (talk) 21:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is coming along nicely. There are 175 other articles about college / university presidents, so university presidents must be inherently notable. Leafyplant 23:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the subject is notable but suffers WP:NPOV issues (even if I happen to agree with the apparent point of view). Tagging to check NPOV. 65.121.0.98 (talk) 23:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]