Talk:Jack Daugherty (baseball)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Baseball: Japanese / Reds Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Japanese baseball task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cincinnati Reds.

Re: Ireland

The whole thing about his popularity in Ireland is, I believe, a hoax. When I originally researched it, the only information I discovered was on some blog, which is not a reliable source. I have, for now, moved it to a section at the bottom and tagged it as disputed. The current source cited is for a publication that may or may not even exist. I'll leave the information in for a while, and if someone can come up with something, please clarify. -Dewelar (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Intrigued by this "hoax," I decided to research it myself. It's a way out story that doesn't even appear slightly possible, but I decided to research it anyway. I couldn't find anything.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also have found no reliable sources of any kind that are available online to support these claims. As the only inkling of it is indeed a blog, I cannot, in good faith as an editor, accept an offline reference to a publication that doesn't seem to exist either. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 13:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps any, I e-mailed Snopes.com the story.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Daugherty (baseball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517114613/http://www.japanbaseballdaily.com/foreignbattingDade-Fyhrie.html to http://www.japanbaseballdaily.com/foreignbattingDade-Fyhrie.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]