Jump to content

Talk:JYJ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First concert

[edit]

Tickets for their November 27 and 28 concert sold in twenty minutes. The JAD article calls this their first concert, which would be in contradiction to the Wik text.[1]

References

  1. ^ Kim, Hannah. 2020. "Talk of the Town," JongAng Daily, October 21; p. 11.

Spelling of Jejung's name

[edit]

This may have to go on the "Hero" page, but since there were edits recently about the member names... On Japanese albums, Jaejoong's spelled as Jejung (as seen on "The..."). This is the spelling used on the JYJ page. However, his name is spelled "Jaejung" on the group's international album (here). Should it be changed to that, since it's the spelling used in an English-language release? Should we pick a name be used for all articles related to Jaejoong? (For the purpose of consistency, I'd like to leave his name "Jejung" on articles related to music and note the different spellings on his own page. The problem is that each of the pages seems to use a different spelling.) Thoughts? - elycione (talk|contribs) 14:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would this potential change apply to all members who have more than one "official" spelling? Why would you use the name "Jejung" on "articles related to music"? Seems like most articles that mention him would be related to music. As I currently understand it, the spelling Jejung is used on the JYJ page, the name Hero used on the TVXQ page and on his article, the different spellings are already clearly noted: Kim Jaejoong (born January 26, 1986), better known by his stage names, Hero, Youngwoong Jaejoong (in South Korea) and Jejung (ジェジュン, Jejun?) (in Japan). It would be more confusing to enforce a Japanese or Korean romanization throughout; it might seem as an attempt at creating a non-neutral point of view. oncamera(t) 02:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that the members' original Korean romanized names should be used. It's already been duly noted that JYJ are known as Jejung/Yuchun/Junsu in Japan. But in the end, the members are all Korean, and in "Their Rooms" Jaejoong's name obviously isn't spelled as Jejung. Consistency should be maintained, and I vote for his name being spelled Jaejoong. Xaari (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The proper thing to do would probably be to go by whatever name each member's Wikipedia page lies at, and if those names happen to change in time, then references to them in that way should change. Well, except for the "Junsu/Jejung/Yuchun" moniker, which has an official spelling. --Prosperosity (talk) 05:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I wasn't very clear in the initial statement. The issue I'm trying to point out right now is that there are at least four ways in which Jaejoong is known - Hero, Jejung, Jaejung, and Jaejoong - and it's a little messy figuring out which name is to be used where (i.e. Hero internationally, Jejung in Japan, Jaejung in Korea, Jaejoong in America...). As for choosing "Jejung" over the rest, it was a biased suggestion that I'd like to retract; I'm most used to seeing that name since I own mainly the group's Japanese releases, but as oncamera pointed out, it would probably be seen as non-NPOV. - elycione (talk|contribs) 03:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name of the group

[edit]

I agree with Prosperosity: In Korea the name is just the three letters. See the Wik Korean page or , e.g., Naver: http://music.naver.com/artist/home.nhn?artistId=143596. Kdammers (talk) 10:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding suggestion to merge List of songs recorded by JYJ into JYJ

[edit]
  • In my opinion, the article for songs recorded by JYJ isn't really necessary at all, because
(1) JYJ have only released two albums and two EPs (the songs of one of the two EPs are even included on the albums as well), so there's a relatively small number of songs
(2) all the songs are included and easy to find in the article JYJ discography
Pancakey-sshi 02:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of some awards

[edit]

I removed the non-notable fan-made awards. It hurt, too, because I love me some JYJ. Shinyang-i (talk) 04:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on JYJ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on JYJ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JYJ disbanded?

[edit]

Recently the last 2 members of JYJ, Junsu and Jaejoong, released a song for a drama soundtrack. but it was named as a collaboration and not a JYJ song. On top of that JYJ's artist profile is no longer on C-JeS's website. Combined with the fact that their socials have remained inactive for years now, and only one member is left under C-JeS right now. would you consider JYJ disbanded at this point? - K-popguardian (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There would have to be an official statement as such, otherwise it's original research. Unless there's an article or source that goes over their inactivity as a group, we can't really be the ones to write the news here per WP:SYNTH.  oncamera  (talk page) 22:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has done this with other groups in the past though such as Speed, TheSeeya, MOBB, Jinusean, TRAX, and 1TYM. None of these groups had official disbanding statements but their labels have removed their pages and everything that shows they manage the artist. If CJ isn't showing JYJ on their website anywhere it means the artist is no longer under their label, and they're probably not making any statements about that either if they haven't already. - K-popguardian (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's original research and shouldn't be happening on Wikipedia.  oncamera  (talk page) 02:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]