Talk:JACDEC

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Proposed Merge

Neither of these articles is really long enough to stand on its own, and the safety index seems like a fairly clear subcategory of the organization that it's named after. A redirect could be set up at JACDEC Safety Index, and all the content put together on one page. --Cantara 18:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible inaccuracy

Where has been debated? At Turkish Airlines office? Even without DC-10 Turkish safety record isn't great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.241.188 (talk) 13:47, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Probable copyright violation

I have removed the "JACDEC safety index" section as a probable copyright violation. The text is very similar to the current version of this www.jacdec.de page; so similar, that I am sure when the section was added here, it was a copy-paste from the 2014 version of the external page.

I think the text in the lead section of the article is a sufficient summary of how the index is calculated. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising banner removal

Hi all,

Does anyone still think that this page is advertising? I read through it and it seems to be a good article. Geardona (talk) 01:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]