This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This content needs a better source than a letter from an advocacy group and a Tweet from a Senator. We need WP:SECONDARY sourcing to show if this opposition is noteworthy enough to include here. Hardly any appointee is unanimously supported, so having opposition isn't notable in and of itself, and advocacy groups write lots of letters and Senators Tweet lots of things, so those two sources don't sufficiently establish that this opposition is particularly noteworthy. It would be better to have newspaper articles, for example. Marquardtika (talk) 18:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't found better sourcing than what's above, and a Tweet from Senator Coons isn't enough to establish that Coons' opposition was particularly noteworthy, particularly since Barker ended up being confirmed. Marquardtika (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
