Talk:Ixtlilxochitl II

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Mesoamerica (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

Mexico

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

First to be baptised?

I've undone the addition that stated Ixtlilxochitl II was the "first Mexican" to be baptised. Usage of the term "Mexican" appearing here is a little ambiguous and ahistorical, so can't be sure in what sense this statement is made; but either way there were baptisms of indigenous New World people before this.

For example, the two Maya interpreters captured on the 1517 Cordoba expedition at Cabo Catoche in Yucatan—Julian and Melchior—were baptised on their return to Hispaniola. Another indio was captured by the 1518 Grijalva expedition in Tabasco, to be baptised Francisco. And then when Cortes finally arrives on the Gulf Coast in 1519, shortly after his landing at Santa Maria de la Victoria the 20 or so indio women who had been given to them (including La Malinche) were "immediately baptised". All this long before Cortes occupied Texcoco in 1520 and set up Ixtlilxochitl II as proxy ruler.

If by "Mexican" the ethnonym Mexica is meant, then that would not be accurate either, since Ixtlilxochitl was a native of Texcoco and therefore Acolhuan by identity/ethnicity, not Mexica. --cjllw ʘ TALK 00:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting me, it seems you're correct. Thanks, Grsz¹¹ 01:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, & thanks for the understanding, cheers. --cjllw ʘ TALK 02:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]