Jump to content

Talk:Ivan Illich/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Question

I don't know anything about this person but what I've read here; I'm just wondering if he should have the "Catholics" tag?• Leon 08:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely. I'll add it. Freder1ck 00:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Freder1ck
About him not having a catholic tag - he was a priest, and a catholic priest. And i don't know what's more catholic than that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plaviobronak (talk • contribs) (13:27, 17 January 2007)
When? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.170.16.108 (talk • contribs) (17:49, 18 August 2007)

Why Italian?

Why is he named as an Italian? I saw no references to him being Italian in any literature. Plaviobronak 13:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Illich came of age in Italy, and also rumour has it that the Church of Rome has something to do with Italy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.170.16.108 (talk • contribs) (20:15, 18 August 2007)

I have added the following "See also" links to the Ivan Illich article: Deschooling, Critical pedagogy, Holistic education, Credentialism, Development criticism, Critique of technology, Lee Felsenstein, Medecine: Criticism of medicine, Alternative Medicine.

Can anyone tell me what is the proper way to indicate a link to "Criticism of medicine" as a heading under the article "Medicine"? Redeyed Treefrog 17:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Most celebrated work?

the article notes it is deschooling society. from whence this claim? according to whom? citation? could not medical nemesis take this honor? pleases discuss.Platypusjones 19:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Agree Medical Nemesis - ideas widely appreciated by UK GPs, even if we don't agree with his conclusions, we generally appreciate the arguments and the risk of over medicalising or of encouraging dependence by some patients upon their doctors. David Ruben Talk 03:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thanks for the opinion, David. i think any entry is susceptible to favoring one work over the other without necessary support. i'll wait for another opinion and then decide on the change, referring to this discussion if there is concern.Platypusjones 14:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Here is another opinion: I suggest that Tools for Conviviality may ultimately turn out to be Illich's most important work. However, I believe that it would probably be fairly easy to demonstrate that Deschooling Society is - or rather was - by far Illich's most widely read work (based on number of book sales) and most quoted work (based on statistics about bibliographical references). But I wouldn't personally know how to demonstrate either of these. Redeyed Treefrog 07:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Talk page cleanup.

I have done some major cleanup here on this talk page, including adding a lot of "unsigned" tags to anonymous comments, as well as rearranging and formatting comments for better flow and consistency. It would help, in future, if people would sign their comments and use proper formatting, including indenting responses to others' comments. Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 18:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Kicked Quotations

  • Learned and leisurely hospitality is the only antidote to the stance of deadly cleverness that is acquired in the professional pursuit of objectively secured knowledge. I remain certain that the quest for truth cannot thrive outside the nourishment of mutual trust flowering into a commitment to friendship.
  • People need new tools to work with rather than new tools that "work" for them.
  • Homo economicus was surreptitiously taken as the emblem and analogue for all living beings.
  • Not only what men do but also what men want is designated by a noun. 'Housing' designates a commodity rather than an activity. People acquire knowledge, mobility, even sensitivity or health. They have not only work or fun but even sex.
  • I do think that if I had to choose one word to which hope can be tied it is hospitality. A practice of hospitality recovering threshold, table, patience, listening, and from there generating seedbeds for virtue and friendship on the one hand. On the other hand radiating out for possible community, for rebirth of community..
  • If you are going to work in a barrio, at least do it in the U.S. so that when they tell you to go to hell you can hear it in your own language.
  • After illegal drugs and arms, the most insidious U.S. export is the American Idealist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.179.33.95 (talk • contribs) (20:55, 10 April 2007)
This annoys me, quite frankly. These comments were removed from the article by an anonymous user, who moved them here to the talk page, and offered no reasoning or justification for their deletion. Quotations of this sort, properly cited, of course, can be helpful in giving a sense of a writer, theorist, or philosopher's ideas. If I can get some assistance finding citations for these quotes, I would like to return them to the article. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 18:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup and removal of "Unreferenced section" and "POV section" tags

I added references to the "Tools for Conviviality" section, and then removed the "Unreferenced section" tag. I also modified the "Deschooling Society" section to replace the contested "most celebrated work" statement by an incontestable "work that brought him to public attention" statement. I then deleted the "POV section" tag. Another POV dispute on this talk page is the anonymous unsigned contribution contesting Illich's notoriety, which I think we can dismiss as being a form of vandalism, since Illich clearly has sufficient notoriety to appear on Wikipedia. Finally there is a POV dispute about "Deschooling Society" seeming dated. I felt obliged to delete the words "seems dated" from this section, though anyone who reads the book will find it dated. The intent of this anonymous unsigned contribution seems suspect, as if someone were deliberately planting irrelevant POV contests in order to provoke a "POV section" tag. - Redeyed Treefrog 10:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Anarchist?

I've read a number of secondary sources that state he was an anarchist, but I'm having trouble finding an original quote where he personally self-identifies his politics. Can anyone confirm that he was an anarchist, and if so, did he ever state a preference for any school of anarchist thought?--Cast (talk) 03:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

There are sources available. Here is an essay in which Illich talks about the "anarchist" nature of Christ, why he believes so, and why he follows him. Illich's anarchist views are discussed at length in The Challenges of Ivan Illich: A Collective Reflection, edited by Lee Hoinacki and Carl Mitcham, as well as in Mitcham's essay "Tools For Conviviality: Argument, Insight, Influence" in the book Europe, America, and Technology: Philosophical Perspectives edited by Paul T. Durbin. A note of caution, though, is provided by Richard Wall in his essay "A Turbulent Priest in the Global Village: Ivan Illich, 1926 – 2002," which serves as both an obituary and a review of Challenges, published on lewrockwell.com, in which he argues that Illich's thinking defies categorization. I would say that only makes him more of an anarchist. More specifically, I seem to recall him praising Prince Kropotkin, specifically, Mutual Aid and Fields, Factories, and Workshops Tomorrow, though I cannot find a source for that (yet). ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 15:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. I'll dutifully research these documents and provide a citation for this article.--Cast (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You're quite welcome. My pleasure, really. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Pennsylvania State University faculty?

The categories include Pennsylvania State University faculty, but the article itself never mentions that status. A reference is needed. I have left the template in place here. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Deleted Neil Postman reference

Illich is only mentioned in passing in the Introduction to Neil Postman's "Technopoly." There is no discussion of him. Cleeder (talk) 14:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

I think the reference was referring to the first clause about other writers, not the second clause about Illich. I've replaced the citation. –Temporal User (Talk) 11:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Laicized?

Ivan Illich retired from public ministry in 1969, but it's not clear to me that he was actually laicized ("defrocked"). That would require a specific action by the church hierarchy. Some news articles and books confuse the two, but I haven't been able to find specific information that he was laicized. Therefore, I'm removing the category "Laicized Roman Catholic priests." If anyone wants to restore it, please also add corresponding text to the article and appropriate sourcing. Thanks. --Amble (talk) 03:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Criticism?

Why isn't there anything here refuting Illich's works, explaining how other educators view his methods? Where are the results of studies done to evaluate his primary tenets? This article is unfinished. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors (talk) 07:06, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Such material would have to be based on reliable, published, secondary sources. If there are existing sources that examine those topics, here would be the place to suggest them. —Coconutporkpie (talk) 14:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Attributing statements to their sources

I added the template {{essay-like}} to the article here since a lot of the writing is opinionated; for instance, phrases such as "maverick social critic", "just a little too loud in his criticism ", "his potent and highly influential critique", and others are placed in quotation marks but given no attribution to their sources, contrary to both Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Other opinionated and/or vague phrases such as "radical critical discourse", "it is important to note", and "Illich worked to open new possibilities" are simply presented as facts. According to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, "opinions should not be stated in Wikipedia's voice. Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc." Editors should "Strive to eliminate expressions that are flattering, disparaging, vague, or clichéd". —Coconutporkpie (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Health troubles

The following material (removed from page here) needs citations to reliable sources, not to mention grammar and style editing:

During his later 20 years, he suffered from a cancerous growth on his face that, in accordance with his critique of professionalized medicine, he coped with non-traditional methods, such as meditation and yoga. In the last few years, he regularly smoked opium to deal with the pain caused by this tumor. At an early stage, he consulted a doctor—who told him he would live only for 3 months—about having the tumor removed, but was told that there was too great a chance of losing his ability to speak, and so he lived with the tumor as best he could. He called it "my mortality."

—Coconutporkpie (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ivan Illich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ivan Illich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Changes, suggestions?

I've added a few paragraphs elaborating on Illich's removal from the Catholic University of Puerto Rico and the transition to CIDOC, and also took the liberty of renaming the primary section "Life and career" (from "Personal life").

I intend to add as much as I can in both biographical information and on his later career as a writer and lecturer, as his work from Shadow Work on is barely mentioned. I would be very interested in any suggestions or ideas.Soulnus (talk) 05:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Family

I have removed Sephardic from the origins of his mother. It appears that the family of his mother came from Bavaria and Austria-Hungary. If they had been Sephardic Jews at some distant point in history is hard to establish from the available evidence. His maternal grandmother was NOT from Texas, but from Munich. MtUllaHistorian (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

National attribute/claim

I have removed Croatian-Austrian from the qualifier of the Illich as I understand from my readings about him and his personal identity was more cosmopolitan due to the fact that he was on the move throughout most of his life. MtUllaHistorian (talk) 11:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Personality

That he was peripatetic and felt homeless has nothing to do with "personality" as it is commonly understood. Nicmart (talk) 23:36, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Roots

"family with ... Dalmatian roots" doesn't quite mean much in 20th century context. This sounds like a Slavic surname. Croat, Serb, ...? --Joy [shallot] 21:40, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

What do about this:
His family was was from Croatia, but he was born in Austria, moved to Italy when he was fifteen, and did most of his important work in Mexico and the U.S. Many countries have a legitimate claim on him. Lunchboxhero

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nixon.94, Amyhuang21, LinJun Li.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Ivan Illich in Washington Heights

I grew up in Washington Heights and with my family attended the Church of the Incarnation where Ivan Illich served. I was 9yo when he arrived, so I have only a vague recollection of people referring to "Monsignor Illich." The article describes the Washington Heights of 1951 as a Puerto Rican barrio. At that time it was primarily Irish with a substantial number of German Jews. It would not become a Latinx community for quite a few years. Immigrants from the Dominican Republic began to arrive in large numbers in the 60s. This is not to say that there were no Puerto Ricans or that Illich didn't interact with them. But he was certainly not immersed in a primarily PR community. 204.144.199.33 (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ivan_Illich/Archive_1&oldid=1172111508"