Talk:Iterated integral
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Multiple & iterated integrals
[edit]I am looking for the right place to point this article or redirect. If you have an idea before me, please do it. It should not link to Multiple integral franklin 00:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Typo in alternative notation?
[edit]Wondering if
in the intro wasn't really meant to be
instead.
chery (talk) 11:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Conditions for order being important
[edit]Its not enough to give an example of when the order is important, one should also state the conditions under which it is important (or not).99.149.190.128 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Is the example given a valid example of a function the order of integration is important for? If using a limit (which I assume is the proper way of evaluating the sigma's upper limit of infinity) one receives that both possible orders of integration result in the answer of zero. Regardless, a few more citations and a little expounding on would be good for such an odd concept. 2602:30A:C079:8ED0:758B:BC07:427B:3740 (talk) 17:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Major Mix Up
[edit]I am most certainly shocked to see this article reading "Iterated integrals". If I'm not mistaken, aren't iterated integrals supposed to pertain to repeated integration, as opposed to multiple integrals? In fact, the page's luck of citations or references makes this more unclear. I'm leaving a few citations and references to my argument, so you can see the difference. Just so you know, there's another page on Wikipedia that relates to Repeated Integation: Cauchy formula for repeated integration.
Alan Beardon (2000). "Fractional calculus II". University of Cambridge.
Weisstein, Eric W. "Repeated Integral." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RepeatedIntegral.html
Samko, S. G.; Kilbas, A. A.; and Marichev, O. I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Yverdon, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach, p. 33, 1993
I'm seriously confused by this mix up. I(and all visiting Wikipedia editors and readers) need clarification.