Jump to content

Talk:Itasca State Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page was part of the 1013 Project. It was originally created or significantly expanded by members of an introductory composition class at the University of Minnesota. Our work on this article ended on May 9, 2007, and we invite all Wikipedians to jump in with further expansion and revision. Be as BOLD in editing this article as you would any other Wikipedia article, but please be good about communicating your changes through edit summaries and talk pages. Students will check back on these articles in the coming months, and we can learn from the changes you make. For more information on the project, visit the project archive.

Headwaters?

[edit]

What does it mean for this lake to be the headwater of the river? Does this mean there are no more lakes between there and the ocean? Why wouldn't water flowing into the lake be counted as part of the source of the river?

I looked up headwaters in wikipedia and that wasn't much clearer. But you could link to it.72.208.56.148 13:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation

[edit]

Could you back up your statement about it being a "key location for summer fun"? It sounds like you are trying to sell me the park. I would like to know how many people visit the park. Does this make it a busy park compared to other Minnesota State Parks? Shishigashira 16:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the line with a fact tag and changed the wording. I believe all promotional sounding stuff has been removed. -Ravedave 17:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it from "key" (vague) to "popular", and added a cite (496,651 visitors in 2006), and removed the fact tag. Also updated that same number in the sidebar. Plus changed wording a bit in the Recreation winter paragraph, and added a link to snowmobile. T-bonham 18:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to often be mistaken for a National Park, as "Itasca National Park" gets 8,830 hits.--RLent (talk) 18:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Climate

[edit]

According to the ref, the date on the temperature & precip figures was from 1998, which means that it would've been in last decade's averages. I provided updated information from an NCDC source, hope that's okay. Gopher backer 01:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Ready?

[edit]

I'd say this is pretty close, except it maybe could use another image or two. Thoughts? Gopher backer 00:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try and make a copy pass right now (assuming the kinder stays asleep). I think more inline references are needed. -Ravedave 22:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Have you tried GA yet? .:davumaya:. 15:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Itasca State Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]