Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
Misc |
6 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Misc
|
End of Itanium? |
5 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#End of Itanium?
|
Repeated deletion/whitewashing of Criticism section |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Repeated deletion/whitewashing of Criticism section
|
Copyright violation |
4 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Copyright violation
|
Response to Copyright violation |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Response to Copyright violation
|
XP Porting |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#XP Porting
|
Itanic derisive nickname |
9 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Itanic derisive nickname
|
unnecessary sentence? |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#unnecessary sentence?
|
Entire Itanium family, or just the first processor? |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Entire Itanium family, or just the first processor?
|
Intergraph v. Intel |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Intergraph v. Intel
|
Itanium vs Xeon |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Itanium vs Xeon
|
Splitting this Article |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Splitting this Article
|
from Talk:Itanium when this was at Talk:Itanium (original) |
5 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#from Talk:Itanium when this was at Talk:Itanium (original)
|
Article misses some important historical perspective |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Article misses some important historical perspective
|
Request for comment: consolidated article |
5 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Request for comment: consolidated article
|
Help with futures? |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Help with futures?
|
Unisys MCP and OS2200? |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Unisys MCP and OS2200?
|
On Gelato |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#On Gelato
|
spin: most vendors? increasing deployments? |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#spin: most vendors? increasing deployments?
|
Change name to "Itanium Processor Family"? |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Change name to "Itanium Processor Family"?
|
Dedicated Windows Longhorn Itanium Edition |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Dedicated Windows Longhorn Itanium Edition
|
Failed Passed "good article" nomination |
4 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Failed Passed "good article" nomination
|
Bus speeds correct? |
6 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Bus speeds correct?
|
Speed benchmarks missing |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Speed benchmarks missing
|
Itanium logo |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Itanium logo
|
Hardware branchlong? |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Hardware branchlong?
|
MiB and KiB v.s. MB and KB |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#MiB and KiB v.s. MB and KB
|
Timeline format |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Timeline format
|
gigabyte (GB) |
6 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#gigabyte (GB)
|
Itanium processors need an article seperate from an article about (ia-64) |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Itanium processors need an article seperate from an article about (ia-64)
|
Should MOSNUM continue to deprecate IEC prefixes? |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Should MOSNUM continue to deprecate IEC prefixes?
|
Reasons for adding POV tag |
4 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Reasons for adding POV tag
|
Floating-point execution in Itanium |
4 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Floating-point execution in Itanium
|
Binary Prefixes for K(i)B etc. |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 1#Binary Prefixes for K(i)B etc.
|
Automate archiving? |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Automate archiving?
|
Market reception |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Market reception
|
Coining Itanic |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Coining Itanic
|
Deleted uncited sentence in one section that is repeated elsewhere in the article and has sources |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Deleted uncited sentence in one section that is repeated elsewhere in the article and has sources
|
Lead and market reception changes - move towards NPOV |
9 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Lead and market reception changes - move towards NPOV
|
Parking lot for House quote |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Parking lot for House quote
|
Ridiculous statistic quoted. Please discuss |
4 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Ridiculous statistic quoted. Please discuss
|
Migration from PA-RISC |
4 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Migration from PA-RISC
|
Visual Studio support |
3 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Visual Studio support
|
Though its speed would have been impressive had it been introduced on time in 1999, it ran only half as fast as the contemporary x86-based Pentium 4 |
13 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Though its speed would have been impressive had it been introduced on time in 1999, it ran only half as fast as the contemporary x86-based Pentium 4
|
Replacement for x86 ? |
4 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Replacement for x86 ?
|
Architecture and implementation |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Architecture and implementation
|
Architecture and implementation |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Architecture and implementation 2
|
IDC |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#IDC
|
Compiler discussion |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Compiler discussion
|
Compiler discussion |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Compiler discussion 2
|
Update for the 9500 series? |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Update for the 9500 series?
|
Strange layout |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#Strange layout
|
"Software support" section is mutating |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#"Software support" section is mutating
|
External links modified |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#External links modified
|
External links modified |
1 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#External links modified 2
|
Itanium was developed by Digital Equipment Corporation, not HP. |
12 |
Talk:Itanium#Itanium was developed by Digital Equipment Corporation, not HP.
|
System Environment should be mentioned! |
2 |
Talk:Itanium/Archive 2#System Environment should be mentioned!
|
External links modified |
1 |
Talk:Itanium#External links modified
|
Windows end of Support |
1 |
Talk:Itanium#Windows end of Support
|
MOS:TENSE |
1 |
Talk:Itanium#MOS:TENSE
|
Is it correct to mix different measurement units for the same item? |
1 |
Talk:Itanium#Is it correct to mix different measurement units for the same item?
|