Talk:Italian cruiser Quarto/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 12:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 12:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	suggest linking Austro-Hungarian Navy in the lead and Service History section Added. Quarto ~~were~~was armed Fixed, good catch. suggest adding a note about calibre of guns (L/50 etc) Added. do we know where her torpedo tubes were located? Unfortunately no, it's not in Conway's. In the Design section, She was also is quite repetitive Fixed Quarto, flying the flag of Rear Admiral Silvio Bellini and the British cruiser HMS Dartmouth, makes it sound like the Quarto was flying the HMS Dartmouth as well as a flag Good catch, a comma was missing. suggest Nino Bixio, HMS Weymouth and Yeah, I think I had started writing that as "The cruisers NB and W and four..." and partially rewrote it halfway through. I think, given the pattern of using ship prefixes then dropping them, that Helgoland should be SMS Helgoland at the first mention Good catch. In November 1940, tests with the new MT explosive motorboats with reduced charges were carried out, which later sank the cruiser HMS York during the war. is pretty clunky, I suggest splitting it into two sentences? Good idea.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Doesn't have any images
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Doesn't have any images
	7. Overall assessment.	The article is in great shape. ~~Placing this review on hold for seven days, just a few prose tweaks and a couple of MOS/style consistency questions to look at~~ Passing.