Talk:It Ain't Easy Being Breezies/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 11:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. Expect a review within 7-10 days; ping if I let it get past that. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few tweaks to add some bluelinks in the lead. Also tweaked the wording in the plot summary somewhat for clarity.
Upon reviewing the sourcing, I am concerned that there isn't enough reliable significant coverage to justify keeping this as a standalone article, let alone meeting the GA criteria about broad coverage. The EW article is a two-paragraph preview/promo blurb that doesn't really contain any critical commentary about the episode. Unleash the Fanboy looks to me like any number of non-professional fan-run blogs that are not usually taken as reliable sources for notability purposes. The content in Art of Equestria is a short paragraph about the design of the breezies. I did my best to look for additional reviews / critical commentary, but I didn't find anything except for fan forums and blog reviews. So even if we accept Unleash as a reliable source, one significant source is not sufficient. Is there any additional critical coverage available? This is especially important as the article lead claims the episode was "was positively received due to [a bunch of factors]" but only has one actual review. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pamzeis, pinging you in case you didn't preemptively watchlist the GA page and didn't see this. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, PMC. Would it be OK if I withdrew this nomination? Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 00:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I have no objection to redirecting this article.

Re-ping: Premeditated Chaos. Pamzeis (talk) 00:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem with withdrawing. I've added the failed GA template and redirected the article. I'm sorry it came out this way - I even checked the Wikipedia Library to see if there were any reviews from archived or database sources and came up with nil, which is a shame. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]