Talk:Issue advocacy ads/Archives/2019
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Issue advocacy ads. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
[UGBA 96] Evaluate Wikipedia
Q: Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
I think the History section is very broad and covers both significant court cases that impacted the limitations on the ads and different rules (such as the bright-line rule) that was implemented.
Each of the court cases and rules has been properly cited with links to mostly the Wikipedia Article that goes more in-depth about the article.
However, at the end of each sentence, there is also a link to an external source that talks about the case and the specific detail mentioned in the sentence prior.
Both of the court cases were from 2010 though, which has now been almost 9 years ago
Additionally, in the history section, there seems to only be information up to 2010, which may represent a need to provide more updated information with perhaps more recent cases or news with the more recent elections (especially the past controversial election with Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mervitan (talk • contribs) 22:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)