Talk:Isotropic coordinates

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Vorticity tensor

Currently, there is no article, AFAICFind, on vorticity tensor (as applied to fluid dynamics), although there is one on vorticity; I assume that there will be in the future. I think it better, however, to use the link vorticity tensor (relativity) for the one that refers to the congruence (it should avoid a future problem). ---Mpatel (talk) 13:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. This is one of the strange gaps in WP coverage. ---CH 00:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Students beware

I created the original version of this article and had been monitoring it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.

Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive. I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.

Good luck in your search for information, regardless!---CH 00:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear lede

What the heck does this mean:

This means that the angular isotropic coordinates do not faithfully represent distances within the nested spheres

Faithfully for who? With respect to what? A freely falling observer? Something else? Also this:

Compare Schwarschild coordinates, where the radial coordinate does have its natural interpretation in terms of the nested spheres.

What is a "natural interpretation"??? 67.198.37.16 (talk) 06:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]