Talk:Isotopes of rutherfordium/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Isotopes of rutherfordium. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Data 2003
This article is part of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Isotopes. Please keep style and phrasings consistent across the set of pages. For later reference and improved reliability, data from all considered multiple sources is collected here. References are denoted by these letters:
- (A) G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot, A.H. Wapstra. The Nubase2003 evaluation of nuclear and decay properties, Nuc. Phys. A 729, pp. 3-128 (2003). — Where this source indicates a speculative value, the # mark is also applied to values with weak assignment arguments from other sources, if grouped together. An asterisk after the A means that a comment of some importance may be available in the original.
- (B) National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, information extracted from the NuDat 2.1 database. (Retrieved Sept. 2005, from the code of the popup boxes).
- (C) David R. Lide (ed.), Norman E. Holden in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th Edition, online version. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida (2005). Section 11, Table of the Isotopes. — The CRC uses rounded numbers with implied uncertainties, where this concurs with the range of another source it is treated as exactly equal in this comparison.
- (D) More specific level data from reference B's Levels and Gammas database.
- (E) Same as B but excitation energy replaced with that from D.
Z N refs symbol half-life spin excitation energy 104 149 A* |Rf-253 |13(5) ms |(7/2)(+#) 104 149 B |Rf-253 |48(+17-10) µs | 104 149 C |Rf-253 |~48. µs | 104 149 A |Rf-253m |52(14) µs |(1/2)(-#) |200(150)# keV 104 149 D |Rf-253m |~1.8 s | |0+X keV 104 149 D |Rf-253m |48(+17-10) µs | |0+Y keV 104 150 ABC |Rf-254 |23(3) µs |0+ 104 151 AB |Rf-255 |1.64(11) s |(9/2-)# 104 151 C |Rf-255 |1.6 s | 104 151 A |Rf-255m |1.0(4) s |5/2+# |-80(180)# keV 104 151 E |Rf-255m |0.8(+5-2) s | |0+X keV 104 152 A |Rf-256 |6.45(14) ms |0+ 104 152 B |Rf-256 |6.4(2) ms |0+ 104 152 C |Rf-256 |6.2 ms | 104 153 AB |Rf-257 |4.7(3) s |(1/2+) 104 153 C |Rf-257 |4.7 s | 104 153 A |Rf-257m |3.9(4) s |(11/2-) |114(17) keV 104 153 E |Rf-257m |3.9(4) s | |0+Y keV 104 154 AB |Rf-258 |12(2) ms |0+ 104 154 C |Rf-258 |12. ms | 104 155 A |Rf-259 |2.8(4) s |7/2+# 104 155 B |Rf-259 |3.2(6) s | 104 155 C |Rf-259 |3.4 s | 104 156 AB |Rf-260 |21(1) ms |0+ 104 156 C |Rf-260 |20. ms | 104 157 A |Rf-261 |5.5(25) s |3/2+# 104 157 B |Rf-261 |65(10) s | 104 157 C |Rf-261 |1.1 min | 104 157 A |Rf-261m |81(9) s |9/2+# |70(100)# keV 104 158 AB |Rf-262 |2.3(4) s |0+ 104 158 C |Rf-262 |2.1 s | 104 158 A* |Rf-262m |47(5) ms |high |600(400)# keV 104 159 A |Rf-263 |11(3) min |3/2+# 104 159 B |Rf-263 |10(2) min | 104 159 C |Rf-263 |22. min | 104 160 AB |Rf-264 |1# h |0+ 104 161 A |Rf-265 |13 h |3/2+# 104 161 B |Rf-265 |~13 h | 104 162 AB |Rf-266 |10# h |0+ 104 163 A |Rf-267 |5# h | 104 163 B |Rf-267 |2.3(+980-17) h | 104 164 A |Rf-268 |1# h |0+ 104 164 B |Rf-268 |6# h |0+
Femto 11:46, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Isotopes of rutherfordium
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Isotopes of rutherfordium's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "93TWG":
- From Rutherfordium: "DISCOVERY OF THE TRANSFERMIUM ELEMENTS", IUPAC/IUPAP Technial Report, Pure & Appl. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 8, pp. 1757-1814,1993. Retrieved on 2008-03-04
- From Hassium: "Discovery of the transfermium elements", IUPAC Technical report, Pure & Appl. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 8, pp. 1757-1814,1993. Retrieved on 2008-03-07
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)