Talk:Isotopes of iodine

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Isotopes of iodine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070121042708/http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/ to http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of iodine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002093204/http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2001-12-11-01-30492 to http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2001-12-11-01-30492
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070823154005/http://ie.lbl.gov/education/parent/I_iso.htm to http://ie.lbl.gov/education/parent/I_iso.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Chernobyl graph is rather misleading

A superficial reading suggests that radiation increases over time, when of course it is the decrease that changes the ratios. A much better graph might show a log of actual radiation released over time. That would show all decreasing, while still showing the increase in Xe as a proportion after the others disappear. Tuntable (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I suppose you could make a log graph, otherwise it should fall fast enough not to show much. Also, if this is what the sources use, then it should be good enough for us. But there are so many ways to do it that are particular to the situation. It says "air", so I presume that means not ones that are in the ground. Gah4 (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Notable radioisotopes section

The #Notable radioisotopes section is severely disorganized. I have made a first pass to sort the isotopes covered by mass number. Iodine-123 and iodine-125 still need to be separated, which is difficult because their similar applications in medicine may result in duplication of information. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

No big deal, but looking at § Iodine-128 and other isotopes I think these are not 'notable'. Remove, or change the ==h2== to "Per isotope description"?-DePiep (talk) 08:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Possible alpha decay of ¹³⁷I

¹³⁷I has an extremely low alpha decay energy of 0.01 MeV, so alpha decay may be possible but with a half-life long beyond imagination. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Summary table is incorrect

In the table at the beginning of the article the decay mode of 123I and 124I are mixed up, incorrectly stating that 123I undergoes positive beta decay. 2A01:36D:115:4E8E:8423:4D71:6F38:7FFC (talk) 09:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

This one shows EC and beta+ 100% for both 123 and 124. Gah4 (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

It seems that the template that makes decay modes doesn't allow for ε b+ 100%. Gah4 (talk) 18:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Updated to NUBASE2020

Several isotopes have been updated to NUBASE2020, and each isotope needs to be upated throughout the wiki. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)