Talk:Isophorone
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Aceton recycling
[edit]Are Cumene process and Hock process the same or are they differnt types of reaction?--134.76.234.75 09:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, a few minutes with google shows that they seem to be used interchangeably, so I've redirected Hock process to cumene process. Thanks for catching it. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Isophorone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060922222157/http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/chronic_rels/pdf/isophorone.pdf to http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/chronic_rels/pdf/isophorone.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Reaction mechanism
[edit]Does somebody know, wether the reaction mechanism provided by the user "Toxgroup" is quoted directly from the source (Ullmanns Encyclopedia ...), or just a proposal from this user? I'm trying to find a safe source for the reaction mechanism. --Kreuz Elf (talk) 11:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- The mechanism drawn is fully conventional. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)