Talk:Isle of Dogs Pumping Station
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Isle of Dogs Pumping Station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Isle of Dogs Pumping Station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hey man im josh talk 01:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Isle of Dogs Pumping Station (pictured) was designed in defiance of Margaret Thatcher? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/jun/22/john-outram-temple-of-storms-listed-pumping-station
- ALT1: ... that the Isle of Dogs Pumping Station (pictured) was nicknamed the Temple of Storms? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/jun/22/john-outram-temple-of-storms-listed-pumping-station
- Reviewed:
Pahunkat (talk) 22:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC).
- Article was moved to mainspace today, so is new enough. At over 3000 characters, it is long enough. The article reads neutrally and properly uses in-line citations. The copyvio detector finds no issues. Both hooks are interesting and are cited in-line. No QPQ is required (though will be on your next one, have fun with that!). Everything looks good to go! SilverserenC 23:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)