Talk:Islamic totalitarianism

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was to it merge to MANIFESTO: Together facing the new totalitarianism..

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Islamic totalitarianism redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

It is a somewhat different concept. Rushdie is attacking the notion of Islamism in government and as government, where as the term "Islamofacism" is used in American "slang" as a pejorative word. Technajunky 20:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and let me clarify, I am AGAINST merging the two articles. Technajunky 19:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm against a merge with Islamofascism, as that article's more about the word than the concept. Ford MF 22:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Against. Agree with the above. The neologism is a word, the other is a political observation. Maybe. They're different, anyway. Mashford 19:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Shouldn't neologisms be avoided? See WP:NEO. Agha Nader 22:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Agha Nader[reply]

Against. Agre with previous two statements. This article is problematic, because it is about BOTH the concept of Islamic totalitarianism AND the manifesto against it. (So, a really brief glance would see "members of the group" and think these are islamic totalitarians...) BobFromBrockley 12:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Against -- Use of the term "islamofascism" is sufficiently notable for separate treatment.

Islamism

I think this should be merged with Islamism.Bless sins 16:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If "Islamic totalitarianism" is a term, maybe move it wiktionary?Bless sins 16:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a terminology asssociated with a manifesto that warrents a separate article.--Patchouli 11:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

This article just represents 1 POV and doesn't say anything about responses of the persons who have been blamed. --Sa.vakilian(t-c) 06:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]