Talk:Islam in Libya

Africa: Libya Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as High-importance).

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance of Islam

Islam in Libya was very important to the gogernment polocies. Since the government was Islamic, there was a higher moral in the lives of the people. This is very good to see that there is a strong foundation for the country to rely on. The Koran is like the rules for the government.

Images

I've removed the images because they are not connected to the article. Jaw101ie 161.74.11.24 14:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point of view

This article reads like it was written by the Libyan government: "Muammar al-Gaddafi is a highly devout Muslim who has repeatedly expressed a desire to exalt Islam and to restore it to its proper—i.e., central—place in the life of the people." - really? There's no evidence to support its claim that Gaddafi is devoutly Muslim, and the claim that the proper place of Islam is central is plainly a biassed claim that only makes sense to a Muslim. Putting women in the armed forces see Women in Libya is hardly a traditionally Islamic act. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

exactly this article needs to get overhauled.Sakimonk (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]