Talk:Isabella Garcia-Shapiro

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles

Disney

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Television

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Seriously do we really need this article? Bottomlivefan95 (talk) 21:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, surely if she gets her own article so should the other friends, and vice versa. --79.71.212.100 (talk) 23:27, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I come with this proposal to merge Isabella into the List of Phineas and Ferb characters, since the character lacks notability at all. To have a stand-alone article, the character must prove notability outside its original source, in this case, the article must prove Isabella is notable outside Phineas and Ferb. Since the article is a stub with only in-universe fancruft already detailed in the list, I suggest a merger. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 05:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge WP:GNG is clear, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." The subject of this article does not satisfy the notability guidelines. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose while currently it is a very short article, give it more time to grow. JDDJS (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is over ~~four~~two years old. How much time should we give it? --AussieLegend (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't know where you got 4 years from but that is very wrong. The show itself is only 3 years old. This article is technically 2 years old, but it spent most of that time as a redirect. JDDJS (talk) 17:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting that the outcome of a previous merge discussion was that the article should be merged. That was carried out with this edit. Given that there is previous consensus to merge the article, we are obligated to do the same again. --AussieLegend (talk) 17:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That discussion is from over 2 years ago. Pages can be recreated if they get more notable. Phineas and Ferb has become extremely popular. Isabella is one of the main characters. JDDJS (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - This article does not demonstrate notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Popularity is not the same as notability. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I guess it is not, but this does still have to go through the proper process. The old decision can be overturned if enough people disagree. As of now it doesn't appear to have enough votes to decide. JDDJS (talk) 17:19, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We need to find more sources for this article. --Confession0791 ^talk 20:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A month has passed and the article has shown no improvement. The content is exactly the same as in the list of characters, so to avoid repetition, I performed the merge. If you think Isabella may get improvement in the future, use a user subpage to make a draft. --LoЯd ۞pεth 06:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]