Talk:Iron Triangle, Richmond, California

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Copywriter000, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 11 April 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Demographics

The claim in the demographics of 66% African American and 35% Latino doesn't really add up (66 + 35 = 101). While there are a few Latino African Americans, there aren't many, and there are some other groups there as wellTotensiebush (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no section about the environmental injustice present in the Iron Triangle. Yes, it says that the demographics are 66% African American with a growing Latino population, but there is no content about the health effects of living in between three major railroad tracks. Not only are their health effects not represented in this article, there only exists a comment about its high crime rate. Perhaps living in toxic conditions breeds violence/crime? There should a serious discussion about environmental justice concerning Richmond, CA. Teresayu1 (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Boundary

I have heard the southern boundary of the Iron Triangle district described as: A) Ohio Avenue B) Cutting Blvd C) I-580 D) The railroad track south of I-580. I have no idea which of these 4 options is canonical, or if a "canonical" definition even exists. - Richfife 04:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the broader definition is the southernmost which is I-580 but most people that far south don't feel they live in the iron triangle, the railroad tracks is the most commonly aggreed upon border, Atchison Village residents dont consider themselves to be iron triangle residents nor do belding woods residents on the far eastern end.^{T ALK}•^QR_C2006•¢ʘñ†®¡ß§ 23:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the few blocks North of Kennedy High School (e.g., Cutting, Overend, Taft and Wall Avenues, etc.) generally considered to be within the broader definition of the "Iron Triangle"?

Copyedit

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iron Triangle, Richmond, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140823232446/http://www.tombutt.com/pdf/Mapping%20Richmond%20Final.pdf to http://www.tombutt.com/pdf/Mapping%20Richmond%20Final.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]