Talk:Iron Mike/GA1
Appearance
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, all old good articles are being re-reviewed to ensure that they meet current good article criteria (as detailed at WP:WIAGA. I have determined that this article needs some upkeep to maintain its status:
- According to the link checker tool, there are several dead links that need to be replaced.
- The lead does not summarize the entire article as required by WP:LEAD. In fact, the lead material does not appear in the body. It needs to be moved to the body, sourced, and a new lead written incorporating and addressing the entire article
- There's a serious issue of coverage; as it stands, what the article is missing is more info about the etymology of the name and the history behind the monuments--currently, it reads as more a list than an article. The lead information is a start, but as mentioned needs to be sourced and expanded.
- File:QuanticoMike.gif needs info about how it qualifies as a PD-MARINE image; a similar issue is found in File:BelleauMike.jpg, File:Ironmike2.jpg, and File:BraggMike.gif, which lack source and author info.
I am putting the article on hold pending the above improvements. Please leave any status updates in this space. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- As no improvements have commenced in the time allotted, I am delisting the article. You may renominate at WP:GAN at any time, but it would be a good idea to address the above issues first. If you have any questions or comments, I don't watchlist these old reviews, so take it up at my talk page instead. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 15:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.