Talk:Iron(III) chloride/GA3

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 05:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	I made a few minor corrections and stylistic changes, which I don't think changed the meaning of anything, but I took too much liberty, let me know
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Using [this version] as reference, full citations are needed for #38, 40, 41, 53, 54. Use WP:CITEWEB for reference All references properly formatted. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 04:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	I'm going to put the article on hold until items in #2b can be corrected. Let me know if there are any concerns. Thanks! Tea with toast (話) 01:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the edits. Well done! Tea with toast (話) 03:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, things in the real world have been busier than anticipated. I hope to be able to finish this review by the end of the coming weekend. Cheers, Tea with toast (話) 04:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I understand. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 16:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tea with toast: Do you have any more updates? Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 21:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]