Jump to content

Talk:Ireland national football team (1882–1950)/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

GA review

Unfortunately, I don't think that this article was ready to be nominated at this time. There are some fairly major concerns that still need to be addressed.

  1. Quality of prose: This needs to be addressed by a thorough copyediting. Looking through the article, several sentences don't end with punctuation. Other Manual of Style concerns are the incorrect use of hyphens instead of en dashes for scores, incorrect capitalization for section headers (except in the case of proper nouns, only the first word is capitalized), and the use of unexplained jargon such as "whitewash". Remember that the article has to be easily understood by everyone, including people who don't follow football.
  2. Verfifiability: Much of the article is unreferenced, including entire sections. The article must be thoroughly referenced to reach Good Article status.
  3. Images: They add to the article, but it is recommended to stagger them a bit (some on the right, some on the left).

The article is off to a good start, but quite a bit of work is necessary before it is ready for promotion. Please thoroughly source the article and have it copyedited (at least once, preferably including someone who is not an expert on football). Peer review is also a great option, and I'm sure it would generate some suggestions that would help the article pass its next review. I am failing the article at this point, because sourcing and copyediting the article is a fairly major task. I urge you to address these concerns and then renominate, as the article is interesting to read and I think it definitely has GA potential. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Looking at this I think the assessment is fair, it only really falls over in two of the six critereon (I have staggered the images). I think we can fix the refs ourselves, and then pass it over for peer review Fasach Nua (talk) 07:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Sections to remove

I submitted this article for PR, and we are getting some good feedback. There are two sections I dont like, Former coaches, as it really doesn't have a lot of content, Crone is mentioned elsewhere as the first manager EVER, but it really doesnt seem worth keeping the rest. The other section is Selected former players, I know it is in the MoS, but is completely unreferenceable, and is WP:OR (I've put a note there) Fasach Nua (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I have removed both sections, if you oject undo [[1]] Fasach Nua (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Cannot understand why list of former notable players and coaches have been removed. All articles on national football team have similar lists and the team was among the earliest national teams ever to appoint coaches for games. Yet World Cup record and picture of World Cup has been added and deemed valid. List of former players is much more relevant then info about a competition the team only ever played three games in. Also links to Celtic Cup are not particularly relevant to this team either. I will add more refs when I get chance. Is there any particular section, para or line you are concerned about which currently lack refs Djln--Djln (talk) 23:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • PS Also mystified at why the concern about refs, article has 39 at the moment. This is considerably higher then the majority of articles I have seen on Wiki. Djln--Djln (talk) 23:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • PPS The article could do some proof reading and tidying up. A lot of recent edits seem sloppy and standard of article has dropped. Djln--Djln (talk) 23:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
If you can reference the notable players then great, I think that is a big issue, it needs to be clear why these players are notable, and others are not? The Scotland and Derry articles which are both at featured article standard have not included such a list, I have requested help here andhere
You are right about the trophy, I was going to remove it.
The refs were picked up in the GA review(I added them for the 1800s section), but they were tagged in the PR too, I suspect the things we might take for granted might not be taken for granted in the wider wikiworld Fasach Nua (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
On the issue of the drop in quality, the recent edits were almost exclusively, References and MoS issues, including referencing after punctuation marks moving hyphens to en-dashes, reformatting dates, staggering pictures and fixing puctuation marks. I am finding it difficult to get someone external to copy edit ... Fasach Nua (talk) 09:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I disagree with the tag on the notable players section. It is not original research. All the players listed played for this team and this tag implies they may have not. They are listed on various websites including www.rsssf.com and Northern Ireland’s Footballing Greats as having played for team. All are notable and/or mentioned in the article. Their individual articles explain why they are especially notable and their contributions to the teams history. These are also well referenced and it would be excessive to reference them all here. I appreciate your efforts to get the article to GA standard but that doesn’t mean we have to copy verbatim the style of similar articles. I also think the tag only serves to undermine the credibilty of the article and should be removed ASAP Djln --Djln (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
It needs to be explained why they are notable and others are not, all European and S.American International teams that have such a list have been tagged as OR, the same as this one, Wales does this quite nicely, but I cant see what can be drawn from it Fasach Nua (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
It is not just a case of inclusion, but also exclusion, how do you know why people were excluded. It could be reasonably argued that Samuel Johnston is notable, but he doesnt have an article, but there is not a great deal of point discussing it here at this point. We should see where the wikiproject goes and then review after that, I can't see it passing GA/FA with the section as is Fasach Nua (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Managers

I dont think a section on managers/coaches is warranted, not when it is only sentence long (I know its in the MoS), could we merge it into either the British champions or 1800s sections? Either way it needs referenced. Fasach Nua (talk) 07:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Some comments on the article, following a request from Fasach Nua:

  1. The notable players section either needs inclusion criteria or removal. An approach I have used in similar situations is to use records to focus on individual players. The success of this approach can depend on the sources available. It worked well for Scotland, but less well for Luxembourg. The complication here is the 1950 cutoff, but the infobox lists record holders so presumably it can be framed in a suitable manner. Perhaps the coaches section could be merged into such a section too.
  2. I don't see the relevance of club or county teams in various sports wearing blue, as none of them represent the entire country. I'm dubious as the the reliability of one of the sources used, what makes ourweecountry.co.uk reliable? Using the phrase The official reason given for the change implies an ulterior motive.
  3. Some other sources give reliability concerns. footballtriv.com is a deadlink, [2] does not have an author listed. [3] and [4] are blogs.
  4. From the beginning Ireland wore a variety of colours, including green, white, and blue. Needs rephrasing, as it could be interpreted as a colour scheme in the style of Harlequins.
  • Things requiring citations:
  1. This result remains the record win for England and the record defeat for an Ireland team., unless this is covered by the ref at the end of the next sentence.
  2. although Ireland went on to lose 7–1, the goal also saw Johnston became the youngest ever international goalscorer.
  3. These losses, together with the initial loss to England still constitute the record wins held by each of the other home nation teams.
  4. however it was later discovered that Reynolds was actually English
  5. However the foundations for that success had been laid over a decade earlier when Ireland had pioneered the use of national team coaches.
  6. Three weeks later, on March 25 one of these four players, Archie Goodall, aged 34 years and 279 days, became the oldest player... and other examples pertaining to records being set or broken, or other firsts.
  7. Amid these political upheavals, a rival football association, the Football Association of Ireland, emerged in Dublin in 1921 and organised a separate league and later a national team.
  8. it was rare for professional players to turn down an opportunity to play at international level.
  9. played for two different associations in the same FIFA World Cup tournament.
  10. All UK-based players from the Republic were pressured to sign an undertaking not to play for the IFA.
  11. ...this had been replaced in the 1930s until the 1950s with a Shamrock badge. This change occurred at a time when the IFA was competing with the FAI to have the true Ireland team, and at this time the shamrock was also being worn by the FA of Ireland's international side.
  12. Use of each stadium for international matches.
  1. In 1923, during a period when the home nations had dis-affiliated from the governing body, - Which governing body?
  2. "However" should almost always be followed by a comma.
  3. From then until the 1949–50 season the IFA regularly selected five to seven players born in the Free State and were rewarded with some respectable results - "rewarded" implies a moral justification.
  4. At least three coaches were appointed, on a match by match basis, they were... - if there may have been more than three coaches but only three are known, the second part would be better rephrased as something like "the three known coaches are...". Oldelpaso (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback, that is exactly what we need to procede! Fasach Nua (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
point 1
The England win is http://www.englandfanzine.co.uk/records/records1.html
The Scotland win is http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/match_details.cfm?matchid=57979
Cant find Wales at the moment
point 2
He is referenced as the youngest ever international, and scoring on his debut means this does not need a ref
point 3
See point 1
Point 4
point 5
point 6
Point 7
http://www.fai.ie/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=9

Fasach Nua has no support for his crusade against "notable players" sections, people should feel free to undo his removals, which are part of a single user campaign, and have nothing to do with this article specifically. 14:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC). MickMacNee (talk) 14:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

First Kit

Was it not blue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.35.50 (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


First Kit

Was it not blue?

I don't think anyone knows, certainly most of the early kits were blue, the Irish FA marketed a Blue kit as the historic kit for the 125th anniversary Fasach Nua (talk) 11:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Need for this article?

I am not sure there is a real need for this article as the Northern Ireland team is a continuation of the Ireland team, it could be summed up in a chapter in the Northern Ireland Football team page, also being a continuation of the Ireland team there for its not defunct as the article suggests. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifcp1 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Agree 100%. This is already causing confusion at Northern Ireland national football team, where an editor is trying to remove records of the team prior to 1921. There's no reason why this article couldn't slot into the NI article "history" section. Mooretwin (talk) 12:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ireland_national_football_team_(1882–1950)/Archive_2&oldid=1176811814"