Talk:Iranian reformists
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
On 24 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Iranian Reformists to Iranian reformists. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 24 January 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. per consensus. – robertsky (talk) 07:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Iranian Reformists → Iranian reformists – Per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:DOCTCAPS. Obvious preference for lowercase in RS sources. See related discussion at Talk:Iranian Principlists. I don't oppose other versions such as "reformists (Iran)" or "reformism (Iran)". (t · c) buidhe 05:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Dicklyon (talk) 15:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per WP:NCCAPS, MOS:CAPS. This is overwhelmingly lowercase in sources (e.g., over 90% lowercase in in Google Scholar results [1]). The capitalized form is so rare it doesn't even rate in ngrams [2][3], with the exception of the phrase "Reformism in Iran"[4], but even in that case, the ngram does nothing to exclude title-case titles and headings, and the capitalization is still not dominant anyway. Efforts to ngram phrases that exclude title-case uses of that term produce too few matches to plot [5], which suggests that the term is too uncommon to be treated as a proper name in the first place, and is simply a descriptive phrase. Per MOS:DOCTCAPS in particular, WP does not capitalize political "camps", factions, movements, etc.; this is not a political party capitalized as a proper name across nearly all the source material. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support—It's plural, so not a proper name. Tony (talk) 02:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Move to Reformists (Iranian faction) or Reformists (Iran) or similar. It seems like "Iranian" is only a disambiguator here. (Otherwise would support the lowercase suggestion per SMcCandlish and MOS:DOCTCAPS.) — BarrelProof (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Article needs to be Updated
[edit]The sources seem to be mostly from 2017 and most bodies have had new elections since then AlexBobCharles (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
A 2024 Iranian Presidential Election Section should be added.
[edit]The article now states that the Iranian reformists won the 2024 election, but does not have a section currently. KyrbsMcWyrbs (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)