Jump to content

Talk:Iran–United Kingdom relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy Personnel

[edit]

The section about this at the bottom of the page has a link I put in that takes the user to the article covering it, it doesn't seem to work, can anyone help? Thanks.Bananaman1966 00:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology

[edit]

I am no expert on Iran-UK relations but how can Sir Anthony Eden be a significant Briton involved in Iranian politics during the monarchy of Fath Ali Shah, when he was born 60 or so years after the Shah died.

Seconded. Eden nor Harold Nicolson were alive at the same time as Fath Ali Shah. Also, the Charles Christie linked appears to be a Hollywood director. Perhaps the wrong Christie? JSlayerUK (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible move to Anglo-Iranian relations?

[edit]

To be consistent with other articles, should this be renamed? See Anglo-Australian relations, Anglo-Chinese relations, Anglo-French relations, Anglo-German relations, Anglo-Irish relations, Anglo-Japanese relations, and Anglo-American relations. There are a few other examples to the contrary, however. Tim (Xevious) 12:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with changing the name. I like to add that for consistency with other articles such as Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Anglo-Persian War, Anglo-Persian Agreement, and Anglo-Persian Treaty of 1801, this article is better to be renamed to Anglo-Persian relations. As you may notice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Company is already redirected to Anglo-Persian Oil Company. --FakhredinBlog (talk) 10:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality

[edit]

This is, as of April 13 07, an appallingly-written piece and full of non-sequiturs. It does not meet Wikipedia's quality standards, I feel.

Fair use rationale for Image:Aussie womens weekly shah.jpg

[edit]

Image:Aussie womens weekly shah.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Le Soir Shah.jpg

[edit]

Image:Le Soir Shah.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing that a page on British and Iran relation make no mention of MI6 or SIS

[edit]

Wow when you read this, it kinda makes you foget that the British controled the Iran goverment for decades and were in partnership with the US involving the Shaw of Iran. Jacob805 (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Labels backward.

[edit]

The legend for the info box is wrong, the UK is the Green island group just off europe whilst the Orange nation in the middle is Iran. I can't work out how to alter it so I'll remove it. could some one who can fix it do so and put it back?(Morcus (talk) 13:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I've made a new map (File:Iran-United Kingdom.svg) in which I've switched the colours around, so it should be okay now. Jolly Ω Janner 20:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Underneath the map the color explaination for Iran is on the left while the one for the UK is on the right, should be reversed but I'm too drunk to figure it out to be honest. 24.47.2.89 (talk) 04:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information

[edit]

In the introduction the article states that prior to 1935 Iran was known as India. This is incorrect as prior to that year Iran was actually known as Persia. The correct previous name for Iran is stated in the article for that country. I'm changing the article to correct this slight error.

Colorado785 (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rushdie Fatwah

[edit]

The fatwah was not a call for his death, but a declaration that to kill him would not be sinful in Islamic terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.151.224.70 (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Um... "In the name of God the Almighty. We belong to God and to Him we shall return. I would like to inform all intrepid Muslims in the world that the author of the book Satanic Verses, which has been compiled, printed, and published in opposition to Islam, the Prophet, and the Qur'an, and those publishers who were aware of its contents, are sentenced to death. I call on all zealous Muslims to execute them quickly, where they find them, so that no one will dare to insult the Islamic sanctity. Whoever is killed on this path will be regarded as a martyr, God-willing." Not sure how that isn't a call for execution. --Cabazap (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Iran–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iran–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zaghari-Ratcliffe

[edit]

One of the key points regarding current Anglo-Iranian relations is that of the detention of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe - should this page not at least reference Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and perhaps the 1971 arms deal as well? 84.13.36.104 (talk) 17:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe seems to be a big omission — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.152.152 (talk) 11:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I agree, I have added a paragraph on this though I am sure it could be improved. |→ Spaully ~talk~  16:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Iran–United_Kingdom_relations&oldid=1207378350"