Talk:Irakli Tsereteli

Irakli Tsereteli is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 21, 2019.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 3, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
August 27, 2018	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
April 13, 2019	Featured article candidate	Promoted
November 18, 2018	Peer review	Reviewed
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 20, 2021.
Current status: Featured article

Asia

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's "Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by BroVic, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 17 February 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Georgia (country) Low‑importance

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History / Mass media Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the mass media in Russia task force.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Irakli Tsereteli/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yerevantsi (talk · contribs) 10:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to finish the review in the coming days. ----Երևանցի ^talk 10:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The article is well-written and has been further improved by Kober and myself (I only made several minor copy edits).
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The article is divided up into appropriate sections. The intro covers the content of the article pretty well.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	The article contains 132 references and 22 sources (mostly books) in the Bibliography section. Many are authored by known scholars. Very paragraph contains several references.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See above.
	2c. it contains no original research.	None detected.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	None detected.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	It is broad in its coverage.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	The article is unbiased in its presentation of the subject, his life, policies, and legacy.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit-warring.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	The article contains 5 images, all properly tagged and created in or before 1917.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.