Jump to content

Talk:Irakli Tsereteli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleIrakli Tsereteli is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 21, 2019.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 3, 2018Good article nomineeListed
August 27, 2018Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 13, 2019Featured article candidatePromoted
November 18, 2018Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 20, 2021.
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Irakli Tsereteli/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yerevantsi (talk · contribs) 10:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to finish the review in the coming days. ----Երևանցի talk 10:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. The article is well-written and has been further improved by Kober and myself (I only made several minor copy edits).
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. The article is divided up into appropriate sections. The intro covers the content of the article pretty well.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. The article contains 132 references and 22 sources (mostly books) in the Bibliography section. Many are authored by known scholars. Very paragraph contains several references.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). See above.
2c. it contains no original research. None detected.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. None detected.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. It is broad in its coverage.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. The article is unbiased in its presentation of the subject, his life, policies, and legacy.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No edit-warring.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. The article contains 5 images, all properly tagged and created in or before 1917.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.