Talk:Iori Yagami/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A few minor problems need to be resolved, but otherwise the article is fine.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   In the lead section, it should be "ended up liking" as opposed to "ended liking". In the "attributes" section, you don't need to second "s" on the plural in "disregarding their clans's past"; " clans' " would be sufficient.

   B. MoS compliance:

   In the "main series" subsection, the number "3" should be spelt out fully as "three". Likewise, in the reception section, "1st" should be spelt out fully as "first". As per WP:MOSNUM, numerals should only be used for double-digit numbers and above.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   In the second sentence of the "creation" section, there is a quote: "broke the mold for characters in fighting games at that time". This should have an inline citation next to it, making it clear where the quote was retrieved from.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Fair use rationales are rather weak; having two images where the rationale is a "visual description" will get hit hard on by FAC reviewers. I'd highly recommend bolstering them, but they're just about suitable for this GA review.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I'm placing the article on hold pending the resolution of the above issues. Once dealt with, I'll be happy to pass the article. -- Sabre (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 16:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Added the quote to ref and changed purposes to images.Tintor2 (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Excellent! I'll pass the article. -- Sabre (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)