Talk:Invertebrate zoology

Animals Mid‑importance

Invertebrate zoology is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Invertebrate zoology is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article seemed to show some forms of bias under the Century subheadings, as I feel not all important information was included. I would recommend adding more information to the introduction paragraph, and perhaps remove the sections about the centuries, as those do not necessarily apply to invertebrate zoology. There can be another wikipedia page that discusses the history of invertebrate zoology, but this page should focus primarily on the physiology and structure of invertebrates instead. Verashark (talk) 18:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, this article is very well written. It supplies many details regarding the history of invertebrates, along with interesting species. However, the history sections appear to shift the focus of the article to be more directed towards the researchers and methods used, rather than invertebrates. Also, some of the terms used could be linked to other Wikipedia articles for the readers use. Sarvere010 (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! First thing first, really great organization in this article! For someone, such as myself, I do not know much about invertebrates, and the subdivision section was laid out really easy to follow and provided useful information. One suggestion that I want to make is changing the subsection "interesting invertebrates" to "Unique Invertebrates", interesting can possibly be bias, such as you might find those ones interesting where as I think others are, so the work Unique I think fits better. I also agree with a few of the comments above, the lead section should contain more information about what fill follow in the article. Overall great structure, with great coverage of facts, and great sources. I feel like you provided reliable, and sufficient amount of citations! Great work! Lizanderson309 (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cipherbug.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

I think this article is put together very well. I like that it contains all the history of studying the invertebrates and I like the section about the different classes and phylum. I don't think I would change the section heading that says interesting invertebrates because interesting is a subjective term. I really like the examples that were given but to make it better you could add more examples as well. Kralikr (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! It seems that the topic of the Interesting Invertebrates subsection is mentioned a few times, I would like to add to this. Having this listed on this page is a nice touch, but I am not sure how it pertains to the actual Invertebrate Zoology subdiscipline that this article is trying to explain. I think perhaps adding which subdiscipline these Interesting Invertebrates associate with could assist in better understanding the topic and perhaps the further specialties if appropriate.Katylady1007 (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The layout is great and I can tell a lot of hard work went into this. One suggestion I have is to add all the subdivisions in the subdivisions section and add more information. Another suggestion is to remove some of the unnecessary transition and filler words. Great job though! Sprousm (talk) 21:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]