Talk:Invertebrate paleontology
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]I deleted my prior comments here because they had become outdated. Dr.Bastedo 23:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Taxonomy
[edit]I've moved the taxonomic list to Taxonomy of commonly fossilised invertebrates, a page which could probably do with a better title. I don't think it really has a place in an article — especially as it's such a long (and incomplete) list. Verisimilus T 06:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
"See Also" needing cleanup?
[edit]The See also section in this article seems cluttered and overly detailed Many Paleo sites have concise boxes or tables beneath the main article that can more neatly present the details in a thematic way. Animalparty (talk) 21:29, 26 October 2013 (UTC)