Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 81 in Pennsylvania

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 81 in Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OR

[edit]

The entire "notes" column is OR and the whole section is WP:UNDUE. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How in the hell can an exit list in a road article be considered undue coverage when literally every road article assessed at FA-, A-, or GA-Class has one, and every B-Class probably does as well? In a highway article, there has been a standard of the Big Three sections for over 15 years or more: a route description, the history, and a junction/exit list. The prevalence of these tables is so common, there's even a section of the MOS dedicated to the proper formatting of them: MOS:RJL. Imzadi 1979  16:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:DUEWEIGHT isn't based on what other articles do. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Route description and history

[edit]

@Dough4872: you restored OR without a citation, why and do you know that you're not allowed to do that? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Horse Eye's Back: please provide a citation for your claim based on this subheading or immediately retract it as I did no such thing. Unsubstantiated accusations such as these are subject to sanctions, up to and including loss to editing privileges. Imzadi 1979  16:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Imzadi1979: a thousand apologies, I meant to tag Dough4872 but my finger must have missed the "C" and as a result your name was still in my copy paste. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]