Talk:Interstate 805/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 00:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The route description contains several consecutive sentences that begin with "It then continues" or "It then meets".
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Most of the history needs to be referenced.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The route description and history could use some more details. The history appears to be missing some information.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

From looking at the article, although fairly decent, it appears to need more information and more references in order for it to be considered a GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it for now. Once more references and information can be added, the article can be renominated. Dough 48 72 00:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]