Talk:Interstate 485

Interstate 485 was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 9, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

U.S. Roads: Interstates / North Carolina Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	North Carolina
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: North Carolina / Charlotte Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina - Charlotte (assessed as Mid-importance).

Exit 6?

I had opportunity to drive 485 this weekend, and I noticed ramp stubs at mile marker 5.8. It looks like this is either a future exit or an exit that was proposed, had work begun on it, and was then abandoned. Does anybody know the details? —C.Fred (talk) 21:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you have discovered is a future interchange for West Blvd. and/or Garrison Road. Plans call for Charlotte/Douglas International Airport to build its third parallel runway next to I-485. Doing so will force the area roads to move elsewhere. Garrison Road, which crosses at the site you mentioned will be shifted and West Blvd will come in at that place as well. It appears to be a huge undertaking and details can be found here: [1] --Triadian 22:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The source say they open at October 2008. I've never been to North Carolina so I don't know anything about exits. But the Exit lists looks fine to me.--Freewayguy ^{Call? Fish} 01:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no current plans to finish exit 6 (West Blvd.) anytime soon. It was created as a future need once traffic density warrants it, but that has yet to happen in the area since growth is relatively slow thanks to the airport. Also, with the possibility of the new toll road being built near the exit, it might be scrapped or modified anyway. --WashuOtaku (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I live in charlotte and the future corridor could possibly run behind my house. --biggie14 7:49, 18 June 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggie14 (talk • contribs)

Exit 18: Oakdale Rd???

I use 485 and I don't ever see exit 18. I'm off of 23C and the 2nd exit I pass is 16, not 18! Biggie14 (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google Maps aerial photos show that there's an exit for Oakdale Road under construction but not opened.[2] Based on that, I've noted the exit as unopened. —C.Fred (talk) 15:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Went one step further, adding Garrison and Wedding Roads and referencing all three future exits to NCDOT. Hope that helps. --WashuOtaku (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Map

I have revised the map of I-485 to reflect its current routing.
Abhijit Sathe (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B

This article I believe represents B class quality. As a member of the US Roads WikiProject I gave this a B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncchild (talk • contribs) 23:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Interstate 485. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix Weddington Rd shift bug

I don't know how to actually fix the Weddington Rd shift by one column bug. Anyone help me? 3125A^{Talk!_{Contributions!}} 18:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When updating junction tables, you sometimes have to expand certain columns to fit new sections in; in this case both Matthews and Charlotte (location) needed to be expanded by one each. Made the corrections, hope that helps. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 485/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: NoobThreePointOh (talk · contribs) 00:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Bneu2013 (talk · contribs) 00:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll probably only be able to respond to the review around the 16th since I'm on vacation right now. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 04:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't think this article is ready in its current state. Some comments below.

Infobox and lead

"Beltway around Charlotte, NC" is unconventional for a short description. For auxiliary Interstates, we would normally use something like "Interstate Highway in Charlotte, North Carolina, United States. Also, spell out "North Carolina".

Per WP:LEADCITE, The entire route lies within Mecklenburg County. needs a citation either here or elsewhere.

Use the date that the numbering was approved by AASHTO as the establishment date. This information can be found here. Also include this information in the history section.

Route description

Link first uses of all numbered routes.

Remove all redundant honorary names in the route description body that are mentioned in the "Dedicated and memorial names". I also suggest rearranging the "Dedicated and memorial names" section into prose form. Examples of this can be found at Interstate 40 in Tennessee#"Music Highway" and honorary designations and Interstate 75 in Michigan#Freeway names.

Cut The segment of I-485 from here to I-85 is the latest segment of the Interstate, completed in 2015.; this is covered in the history section.

Cut The interchange ramps were closed as part of a project to build express lanes along I-485 on August 1, 2023. and move to history section if necessary.

Use |Convert= for all precise mileage figures.

This isn't necessary if the current citations are adequate, but we usually use maps such as road atlases or ones provided by the respective DOT for route descriptions.

Third paragraph in "Orientation and signage" is not cited. Also suggest combining second and third paragraphs in this section and rewording as necessary.

Unclear if the inner-outer system has always been used on I-485.

Cut any other information that is irrelevant to this section.

History

Missing information about the background and planning of the route.

Since practically all of this route was built after the National Environmental Policy Act, it was most certainly subject to multiple environmental impact studies. I strongly suggest including information about these studies; as a bonus, an EIS will usually provide information about the planning and background of the project. Most of these are available on Google Books, the Northwestern University Transportation Library, HathiTrust, and other sources.

The first section opened around 1967, yet planning for the outerbelt didn't begin until 1975? Was the first section intended to be part of a different route? Clarification is needed for this.

Per WP:SUMMARY there are too many short paragraphs. I suggest combining them into longer paragraphs in order to ensure no more than four paragraphs per section in most instances. This is the formula I followed with Interstate 40 in Tennessee (an FA) and other road articles I have promoted to GA. Single sentence paragraphs like In 1975, planning began for the Charlotte outerbelt. are especially discouraged.

Suggest saying that the Governor and transportation secretary officiated the groundbreaking ceremony.

Add the dates that work began on each section or the contract was awarded, if available.

The entire widening project most certainly did not take place entirely in May 1999. Add the start and finish dates for the project. Ditto "October 19, 2004".

Reword NCDOT could not immediately deal with the issue thanks to a 2000 policy that prevented the state using trust fund money to less opiniated language.

had begun the right-of-way acquisition phase with contracts awarded in June 2010. - Right-of-way is usually acquired before construction contracts are awarded. This needs to be clarified.

I suggest splitting this section into subsections about initial construction and post-construction activities (widenings, new interchanges, etc.), although I am aware the latter began before the route was completed. You will likely end up with a separate subsection for planning too.

Rearrange sentences about future interchanges to include the grading first, followed by the opening date.

I'm seeing a number of redundancies and ambiguities throughout this section. For example In 2003, the last 12.5 miles (20.1 km) needed to link main I-485 to its northern stub was completed, at a cost of $55.4 million (equivalent to $88 million in 2023[48]). Opening in two phases, the first 7.5-mile (12.1 km) segment opened on September 3, 2003, between University City Boulevard and NC 27 (Albemarle Road); two months later, the second five-mile (8.0 km) segment opened on November 19, between Albemarle Road and Lawyers Road. No need to mention "2003" or "the last 12.5 miles" in the first sentence, although I do wonder if both sections were planned to open at the same time. Suggest rewording to something like "The 7.5-mile (12.1 km) segment between University City Boulevard and NC 27 (Albemarle Road) opened on September 3, 2003. On November 19, 2003, the adjacent five-mile (8.0 km) segment extending to Lawyers Road opened. This linked main I-485 (specify what "main I-485" is) to its northern stub.

seven-mile (11 km) segment was noted that it would relieve traffic along the Billy Graham Parkway and provide an alternative route to Charlotte Douglas International Airport. - did these benefits come to fruition?

No mention of the I-85/485 interchange project; I see citations for this elsewhere. I also suggest moving information about congestion at this interchange from the route description here.

Future

The toll lanes had likely been planned before November 18, 2011, since that is the date the article was published.

At a cost of $202.9 million, the 16.6-mile (26.7 km) I-485 Express Lanes project will establish new toll lanes along its entire planned route. - "its entire planned route" is ambiguous.

Construction was slated to begin "tentatively" in mid-2018, and is currently still going on as of 2024. - did construction start in mid-2018?

I suggest making this a subsection of the history section, and retitling it to something like "Toll lane construction".

Exit list

If you can find a better source than Google Maps for mileposts, this is preferred. Also, this source only covers roughly the western third of I-485.

Citations needed for future interchanges.

References and images

Several citations are dead and/or incomplete.

Images are awkwardly bunched together. Suggest alternating orientations.

Align images to where the photo of the reassurance marker appears in the "Orientation and signage" section. Reword caption to something like "A reassurance marker displayed on I-485 outbound near Matthews. As a complete beltway, I-485 uses the inner–outer directional system."

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.