Talk:Interstate 287/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 11:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Criterion
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good Job. /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 20:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
To Work On list (specifics)
[edit]- Sorry it has taken me so long to deal with this. To start off the intro is way too big. Remember that the intro is only meant to be an introduction to the article not a route description. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 21:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Fixed - Cut a couple of sentences out. ---Dough4872 18:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Dablinks are not resolved.
Fixed- For the NY 287 link, the dab page lists two separate NY 287's that existed at different times. The template used automatically links to New York State Route 287 and I do not see any need to directly link to one of the two NY 287's. Fixed Oyster Bay link. ---Dough4872 18:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Source 7 seems not fully verifiable. Could we find a Governmental Law report?
Fixed - Found source from NY legislature. ---Dough4872 18:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Source 36, what type of source is it? Is it online?
- It is a book source not online. ---Dough4872 18:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Resolved/MWOAP|Notify Me\ 20:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Please do not change the status of the criterion, the reviewer will change that their selfs. Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. ---Dough4872 18:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)