Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 229 (South Dakota)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 229 (South Dakota)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 06:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 06:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why not use the abbreviations for the state highways (SD)?
    • Fixed.
  • I don't see where it mentions the mall in ref 3.
    • Moved up the correct citation.
  • "which required workers to direct traffic" On opening or during construction?
    • Added a bit.
  • Consider adding some inflation numbers for the construction costs.
    • Added for both of the missing figures.
  • Shouldn't the interchange at I-90 be marked as incomplete if it doesn't have the complete set of ramps?
    • Marked CR 125 as incomplete, as all movements to I-90 are there.
  • Would be nice to have the downtown loop route on the interactive map too.
    • Added.
  • The second external link just redirects to the main page, fyi.
    • Removed.

That should be it. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nova Crystallis: That should be about it. SounderBruce 08:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk09:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 08:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

On that note...

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: ...we're ready to roll! My personal preference is ALT0 because I love the contradiction in a freeway emptying into an unpaved road, but ALT1 is interesting too. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 02:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Promoting the main hook (ALT0) to Prep 2Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]