Talk:Interrupted gene

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
	This redirect is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 March 2020 and 29 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Phammh.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

This article provides a simple overview of what an interrupted gene is. The page was created to help people understand what an interrupted gene is, since no clear explanation is given in any articles, nor through a Google search. Granted, while the process of DNA splicing is much more complex, the links to introns and exons provide greater detail about their role. Rrten00 20:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I do not think this is a speedyable article. I have a basic, college intro-level understanding of genetics, but I didn't know what an interrupted gene was. Now I do. I'd like to remove the tag, any objections? delldot | talk 20:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the speedy deletion tag. This is a valid subject and the article is a reasonable start on it. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-10 20:48Z

References

Not sure if the second source is a reliable source because it is a self-published source. It is directly related to the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phammh (talk • contribs) 21:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed

This article needs a lot of cleaning up to correct false and misleading information.

I recommend that it be deleted or converted to a stub that refers back to Gene and Intron. Genome42 (talk) 23:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Genome42 I agree. I generally err on the side of 'inclusionism' but the useful content in this page is so close to just a duplicate of the Intron#Discovery that I think stubbifying this back to a simple definition of "Interrupted gene" would be best, with maybe a couple of sentences on its historical relevance as a term (it's a particularly commonly used any more as far as I'm aware).

By keeping a stub definion here (rather than a simple redirect somewhere else) we avoid having to say something like "Genes with introns used to sometimes be called interrrupted genes in such and such context" in the middle of whatever page was redirected to. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 05:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Split gene

"Split gene" currently redirects here. I've actually seen the term 'split gene' used more commonly to refer to the genes used in protein-fragment complementation systems - and occasionally even for a gene whose RNA undergoes trans-splicing (example) or that enodes an intein-containing protein (example). What do people think of having Split gene be a disambiguation that acknowledges that the term has been used an a few different contexts and link to the most common ones? T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 05:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]