Talk:Interracial marriage

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interracial marriage article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Genealogy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Improving page

Hello, I'm a new wikipedia editor and I just noticed that the legality section on this page is a bit odd because it starts by listing places were interaical marriage was historical banned. I'm thinking about adding a first paragraph but the current legality then moving the current part of it to a subsection labeled history. Thoughts? Wik206 (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Or should legality just be renamed history seeing that's what it's more about? Wik206 (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sound more accurate. 2601:680:CE83:C580:C115:D0D6:895D:1D97 (talk) 01:23, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interracial children are more attractive and other funny biases in this article.

Found this article to be biased but was laughing when it stated that interracial children are more attractive than non interracial children. Was curious if anyone else found humor in this article? They put Nazi Germany right after The United States when talking about interracial marriage being illegal. Better watch out you are a Nazi if you think that it should be. Unique Bob (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interracial_marriage&action=edit&section=new[reply]

I find the use of the word "bias" as an adjective to be somewhat humorous. The idea of race having any definite meaning is also humorous. HiLo48 (talk) 07:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch 2601:680:C700:F60:A089:A163:C8D2:D430 (talk) 12:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article only cited that subjects in a survey found biracial people more attractive. The article never said that they actually are. This way, the article is not really biased, it just shows that some people are biased. Markita2023 (talk) 22:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Media

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 September 2024 and 11 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Markita2023 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Markita2023 (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Race

Any discussion of interracial marriage needs to begin with the fact that race is a construct only and has no scientific validity whatsoever.

Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society. While partly based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning. The concept of race is foundational to racism, the belief that humans can be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.

Additionally, the term miscegenation is pejorative and so should not be used. Kanchan M Mahon (talk) 15:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]