Talk:Interracial adoption

Untitled

Should this article be called "transracial adoption"? It seems that the citations refer to "transracial adoption" rather than "interracial adoption". It seems that these terms are used interchangeably, but there may be a subtle difference between the two. --Yes: transracial adoption is the term widely used in the academic and popular media on the topic. "Interracial" is a dated term. Notice that even if you google "interracial adoption", almost all of the hits (besides Wikipedia) are for "transractial adoption. --90.198.191.24 (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"interracial adoption" is the best known name for it (or so I thought), so I think it is under the right name under Wikipedia naming conventions. Google results disagree with me though so maybe you can see about getting it changed. You will have to ask someone who is more familiar with doing that. (Sorry, I am just familiar with minor editing.)

109,000 for "transracial adoption"

105,000 for "interracial adoption"

anon 12:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.97.245 (talk)

I think "transracial adoption" is a better title, because the word 'interracial' is tainted due to it being associated with pornography.--Flesh and blood and need and want (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The statistics section is completely American-centric, is that right??? Inter-racial adoption occurs in other countries too! Are there any worldwide statistics at hand?? Surely these should be cited instead, or it should be made clear that the current statistics are American only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.28.80 (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the article's current state, the third paragraph of the Statistics section refers exclusively to the UK, but I have to say, as an UKian educated to University level, that much of it is written in jargonistic, opaque language that I have difficulty making much sense of. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 212.95.237.92 (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 16 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zazraj.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interracial adoption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051203230630/http://statistics.adoption.com/information/adoption-statistics-foster-care-1999.html to http://statistics.adoption.com/information/adoption-statistics-foster-care-1999.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

English

About checking and The mess

41.116.82.250 (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appearance discomfort section

This section may have copied and pasted information from elsewhere. It includes the line "Furthermore, we did not find differences in self-esteem between transracial and same-race adoptees" (not in quotes) which reads like text from a research study, and should potentially either be paraphrased or put in quotes, but I don't have access to the cited article.

The next paragraph has in-line citations that makes me think it was pasted from someone's thesis or another paper. Es2241 (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Academic Research

The sectipn on "Academic Research" reads as a user's original research (using I and we statements) which to my knowledge generally does not align with editorial standards Calvin Ransom (talk) 07:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]