Talk:Internet rush hour

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Internet rush hour article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 25 March 2013 by reviewer Rushton2010 (talk · contribs).

Internet transparency

Bandwidth throttling section was not directly related to the topic of the article: Internet Rush Hour. I have tried to rephrase it in a more objective way stating the technical problems : the pipes are too small to support peak hour traffic - who must pay to increase the pipe size?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet Rush Hour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120518101749/http://www.isc.org/solutions/survey/history to https://www.isc.org/solutions/survey/history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

US Rush Hour?

Would the Rush Hour for the US be at the same hours of the day (7-11 pm)? Or should we just calculate the time zone difference from the UK (making the rush hour here 2-6 pm ET)? Thanks2602:306:CD9B:E9A0:81B2:5C19:A28E:BC1C (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All massively out of date

All the cited source references are at least six years old on this subject, so must be way off the truth by now in the fast-moving world of the net. For example, a 24-hour chart showing peak web use in 2017 suggests 9am to midday to be the common daily peak, in contrast to the times of 7pm to 11pm given in this article's intro from a source dated 2011. [Source: Google Analytics https://www.hallaminternet.com/google-analytics-hour-of-day-day-of-week-reports/ ] 217.155.200.241 (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2607:F2C0:9238:F600:283A:A1F0:50ED:9701 (talk) 21:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)line 4 on Google Analytica data.

The reference 2 originally shows the graph of "conversion rate" per hour of the day, namely showing how much % of the web visitor really, e.g., buy the item shown in the website. Obviously people do not make a decision at 4 AM. Therefore the lines 4 and 5 are not on the traffic in the internet. Please delete them.Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). 2 in the article.

Still relevant

Is this still a thing? Internet infrastcuture is no longer affected by the same consumer constraints it used to be, and things like streaming are far more relevant now. Given it's so out of date, should we be deleting this articel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnyboy5 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While the article is old, it still seems to be a thing:

This article reminds people to focus on latency too, https://circleid.com/posts/20231211-its-the-latency-fcc
Here's a 2019 article from the BBC looking at when people in the UK use internet the most: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49880018
finally here's a report on measured latency over time, and with a daily cadence once again from the UK: https://samknows.com/blog/samknows-critical-services-report-uk

I think internet congestion for streaming can be much worse. It will cause data loss in the stream, and possible stalls due to routing changes.

But being that a quick search for this seemed to hint at UK pages, is this a UK phenomenon, or turn of phrase? Russetrob (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]