Talk:Internet Explorer for UNIX

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Microsoft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Icon?..

I don't think the icon uswed currently fits in with the Unix version, as it is the Macintosh one! Could someone upload a PNG of the current version? Thanks RaviC

Actually, it does appear to be the UNIX one; see "Oe-Ie5-unix.jpg" linked from the page. -- Limulus 04:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance

I trimmed the "Mysterious disappearance" section a bit. Mostly because it was a borderline original research ("If one were to take the analogy further...") and it was also speculative ("it could be that..."). Further, it had lots of weaseling ("some consider"). It's fine to say "MS won the browser war and then rested on its laurels", and everyone knows that, but can we point to a reference that says so?

But the bigger question in that case is, even if we do source this stuff, do we care, and does it have any relevance to this topic? Microsoft's love-hate relationship with Unixen probably needs an article of its own...

Now don't get me wrong, I have the same opinion as the article's former conclusions were; I just couldn't justify their existence in the current form, and I don't think speculation in general has place in Wikipedia.

And frankly, its disappearance wasn't "mysterious". Unprofitable and uncomfortable projects get discontinued all the time. What was mysterious that the browser existed at all in the first place. =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, and I'd like to note that external links on the speculation are probably OK though, they may provide additional insight with no constraints set by Wikipedia's policies - just don't go using them as sources or something =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case anyone comes looking, the "mysterious disappearance" section can be viewed here. Maybe the talk page is indeed the best place for this :) -- Limulus 13:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IE Unix.PNG

Image:IE Unix.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't upload the file, but I filled out the stupid form. I hate how the overzealous adherence to the rules (rather than investing the time to actually FIX the problem) results in a form of censorship that's IMHO more insidious than the vandals. OK, I've had my rant for today. -- Limulus 18:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agrees. It's the fucking logo, dipshit bot, it's in the rules!~~Lazyguythewerewolf . Rawr. 08:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Internet Explorer 4 for Solaris screenshot.png

Image:Internet Explorer 4 for Solaris screenshot.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*eyeroll* OK, time to fill out the form again... -- Limulus 04:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Link in References List

The external link http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/110300.JCH.Bristol3.pdf mentioned under References as the second one and used four times in the article page is now dead. So i wish someone could help me put the <dead> marker as it appears on other pages so as to preserve the link for historical reasons, or should I process with reformatingt the article page by eliminating the links from all sites of mention? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Compfreak7 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Internet Explorer for UNIX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/110300.JCH.Bristol3.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?980127.wiieunix.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020802053023/http://www.microsoft.com/unix/ie/default.asp to http://www.microsoft.com/unix/ie/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Internet Explorer for UNIX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]