Talk:Internationalist Theatre

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 October 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Internationalist Theatre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

==Why are edits by veteran Wikipedia editor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philip_Cross being cancelled by @Atlantic306 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 == If a senior editor like Philip Cross who has the power of rollback, and auto patroller has approved of the copyedit on the Reception of plays by Internationalist Theatre why is @Atlantic306 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306

deleting this?

Thank you IPG address — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.162.16 (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now we have another Wikipedia editor who instaed of being constructive and removing the so called `fawning ` bits from press Reception

which is what @Atlantic306 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 could also have done , just disregards them as spam too? to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roscelese since when were reviews from national and international press considered spam? You seem to have some sort of axe to grind? Thank you IPG address {{213.104.162.106 (talk) 13:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peaceray gay bashers have no place on this talk page, but neither do editors who disregard some serious input , and do not carry out their remit to edit out the so called `fawning bits` so described by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 but approved of by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philip_Cross who has written several article on actors and obviously knows what is genuine press in the theatre world? Please view the material yourself and then do some editing , but restore the ==Reception== section amended by you. Thank you IPG address {213.104.162.106 (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)}[reply]