Talk:Internationalist Theatre

==Why are edits by veteran Wikipedia editor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philip_Cross being cancelled by @Atlantic306 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 == If a senior editor like Philip Cross who has the power of rollback, and auto patroller has approved of the copyedit on the Reception of plays by Internationalist Theatre why is @Atlantic306 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306

deleting this?

Thank you IPG address — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.162.16 (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Now we have another Wikipedia editor who instaed of being constructive and removing the so called `fawning ` bits from press Reception

which is what @Atlantic306 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 could also have done , just disregards them as spam too? to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roscelese since when were reviews from national and international press considered spam? You seem to have some sort of axe to grind? Thank you IPG address {{213.104.162.106 (talk) 13:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)}}

---

What have gay rights got to do with disregarding acknowledged press reviews as spam by by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roscelese

to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peaceray gay bashers have no place on this talk page, but neither do editors who disregard some serious input , and do not carry out their remit to edit out the so called `fawning bits` so described by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 but approved of by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philip_Cross who has written several article on actors and obviously knows what is genuine press in the theatre world? Please view the material yourself and then do some editing , but restore the ==Reception== section amended by you. Thank you IPG address {213.104.162.106 (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)}