Jump to content

Talk:International reactions to the Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen (2015–present)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Public protest section

[edit]

The section on public protests appears to be referenced to a vague, self-published 3-sentence rehash of a Press TV report by writer and conspiracy theorist David Icke. I could not find any primary sources reporting on public demonstrations taking place in said countries other than the report published by Press TV, a news organization which is commonly used as a propaganda tool by the Iranian government. By the way, the original source claims "tens of thousands" of Palestinians held mass demonstrations. It's strange how I couldn't find any reports by major news organizations (or Vietnamese tabloids, for that matter) on this event in particular.

Unless anyone can provide reliable sources regarding the protests, the section should be deleted. Elspamo4 (talk) 03:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. We need reliable sources for information on Wikipedia, per WP:V. That category doesn't include self-published blogs and websites, state-controlled media in unfree states, and fringe outlets. -Kudzu1 (talk) 04:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Public Protest is public opinion and ingredient of international reaction: Public protests organized by citizens of different countries in various cities and in front of some embassies have been reported by different news channels and clips can be seen in international media. Ignoring public protests there will be a question marks on international reaction. Reputable media is depending on twits and social media due to worsening conditions and their inaccessible approach to prompt and unbiased news. Thus Deletion of Public Protest is strongly opposed. Nannadeem (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-national responses

[edit]

I had put a question here about the Times of Oman, but then answered my own question. :D

But in the process of moving information to this article from the parent article, I noticed that quite possibly a "sub-national responses" section could be used, so as not to conflate the actions of a sub-group in a country with the actions of the government (or indeed the entire population). Is it OK to add this? Tal grey (talk) 23:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think we've been doing that as sub-bullets (for example, Hamas and Somaliland). -Kudzu1 (talk) 02:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Link?

[edit]

I checked the article for any duplicate links and it seemed that the link to Arab League was duplicated. should I delete the first mention of it or the flag link? Frozenfire71 (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on International reactions to the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen (2015–present). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International reactions to the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen (2015–present). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:International_reactions_to_the_Saudi_Arabian-led_intervention_in_Yemen_(2015–present)&oldid=1207727397"