Talk:International framework of sexual violence

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caroline,

It seems like you are a pro Wikipedia editor - the layout looks just perfect, glad to have you on our team! It's evident that you also spent a lot of time on the content. I had two questions:

- I can see how the entry could be it's own wikipedia page, it's not too lengthy for our purposes, is it? I'm actually unsure.

- There are pages on Wikipedia for "war rape" (with a section on law) and "UN Action Against Sexual Violence in Conflict". I am mentioning this because you have a few instances of mentioning sexual violence in conflict. Not sure if any of the information is already on the other pages? Seda1900 (talk) 23:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)S.[reply]

Seda,

I am glad you appreciated the layout, I will also try to add photos before December 18th.

Concerning your questions, I was wondering if the length of the part on international law would be problematic. I then decided to get rid of few tables, and I will also try to reduce and cut some sentences. Like I also mentioned during our group meeting, I feel like my part might also be too analytical. Will work on that as well.

Thank you also for letting me know about the wikipedia pages. The "war rape" page has a section on law, and it covers a lot. I will redirect my section to this article as well. I also think that the "war rape" article could be useful for Gina's historical part.

CarolineRoy22 (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline,

This a long, but very solid section. The tables are detailed and contain a considerable amount of information, but like I said during our meeting, I think they give a good and structured overview of relevant provisions. I think we should keep them. I also like the fact that you now have moved them under the relevant text and not at the end. Moreover, I think it works well the way you have integrated the table you had on UN resolutions, etc. into the text. It could have been too many tables otherwise.

I would also like to make the following comments:

- "Comfort Women" and "Rwandan Genocide" are in brackets in the text accompanied with "see also". Should these maybe be moved to the "See also" section at the end of the main article?

- Quotes in the text are written in italics. We should make sure that we are consistent in our use of quotes throughout the article. I, for now, have not put mine in italics, but will of course to this if we all agree on that.

- It looks good with the quotes you have inserted on the right side of your article/chapter.

- The beginning is perhaps a bit more analytic than descrpitive. (You also mentioned this during out last meeting and I agree.) Maybe the sentences could be "simplified" in the sense that they just present the facts, i.e. for the second sentence: "It is a devastating phenomenon and often perceived as an inevitable repercussion of warfare".

Vic.nor (talk) 13:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments Victoria. I also believe that the tables are an added-value for the article.

For your first comment : yes, I think it should be under "see also", you are right.

Second comment: We can discuss on saturday whether we put them in italics or not.

Third comment : I agree with the quote. Why don't we put pictures as well ..?

Fourth comment: Entirely agree with you. Will rephrase this week. CarolineRoy22 (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline, great job! I like your tables!! One short comment: We both mention the Toyko and Nurnberg Tribunals and link as well the Comfort women. I'm not sure if one of us should delete it? Ginme (talk) 14:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gina,

Thank you! Since I have the biggest section, why don't I delete it ? or rephrase it in a way that it does not overlap with your content ? CarolineRoy22 (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International framework of sexual violence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5xc2eRFDv?url=http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/text/econvention.htm to http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/text/econvention.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International framework of sexual violence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]