Talk:International cricket in 2006

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Well done that man/woman/collective that had the time to copy all these out. Although we have not reached May 2006 yet and certainly not August mighten we benefit from a (at present blank) table of the Test and ODI Championship tables? Tony2Times 23:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Sam Vimes 00:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although Pakistan is touring Britain as a whole, it is facing the English and Scottish teams seperately, I think they should be regarded as such in the tables.Tony2Times 18:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, and more emphatically this time I stress why is Netherlands included in Sri Lanka's tour of England, at least with Scotland the two nations are related but Holland's completely different, I don't understand why it isn't given its own seperate heading and own scorecard. Makes sense to me. Tony2Times 14:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, didn't spot this before. The reason I did it is because it's "on the same tour", the players don't go home in between, it's most likely the same squad going there, and so on. Wisden usually does it in case of continuous tours (such as England in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka in 2003-04). Then again, there's an argument for grouping Australia's tours of South Africa and Bangladesh together, which doesn't really make the same sense. To avoid this, I think you're right and it's better to split the two. Sam Vimes 16:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]