Talk:International Typographical Union

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for May 3.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Disambiguation page move

See Talk:ITU (disambiguation). --Usgnus 18:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New York Typographical # 6

"Printers had the ability to shutter the employers' mouthpiece, giving the union more power than the employer could muster. This influence led the ITU, in 1897, to win the best working conditions in the American publishing industry — a 48-hour work week and a standard wage scale for all printers in the city."

Exist or not?

Opening paragraph (my bolding):

The International Typographical Union (ITU) was a labor union founded on May 3, 1852, in the United States as the National Typographical Union. In its 1869 convention in Albany, New York, the union—having organized members in Canada—changed its name to the International Typographical Union. A 1986 merger vote, series of local mergers, and a 1988 jurisdictional agreement led to most of the ITU's mailers joining the Teamsters while the remaining printers of the ITU merged with the Communications Workers of America. As of 2006, the ITU is the oldest surviving trade union in the United States.

If the Union no longer exists because it merged into 2 separate unions, how could it be the oldest surviving trade union? If it does still exist in some form, that needs to be explicitly stated somewhere within the article. -- not logged in, Exodio is user 12/20/2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.146.80.34 (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting point... If currency (being current) is best, then I would name the article "Printing, Publishing, and Media Workers Sector, CWA" since the union is now a part or sector of the Communications Workers of America (CWA). However, I think it's even more important to leave the entries separate. Right now, the name is "Printing, Publishing, and Media Workers" but with ITU still all over the InfoBox. I would leave previous incarnations with their own separate entries and cross-refer the lot. IMO - Aboudaqn (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]