Talk:International Congress of Women

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): M.n.r.4141994. Peer reviewers: M.n.r.4141994.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2019 and 2 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cappell0sophia.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ref

FYI - found a reference on the 1904 Berlin conference - [1]. It's actually one of a series of articles - search for the author.Smkolins (talk) 00:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing this article

"Proposed Changes"

I am plan on fixing the introduction so that it has more information leading up to what will be talked about. I also plan on adding more information to the topics following the introduction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.128.254.18 (talk) 03:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Outline"

Introduction

Discuss the meaning of the title of the article
Discuss what will be talked about throughout the article

Topic 1

Paris 1878
This topic is already well discussed and I have already made some edits to it

Topic 2

London, June 26 - July 7, 1899
More in depth research needs done

Topic 3

Berlin June, 1904
This topic is researched as well as it could be

Topic 4

Amsterdam June, 1908
People who attended this conference
Research on what was aimed for at this conference and who was in charge of it

Topic 5

Stockholm 1911
People who attended this conference
Research on what was aimed for at this conference and who was in charge of it

Topic 6

The Hague, April–May 1915
Fill in gaps where more research is needed

Topic 7

Zurich, May 1919
People who attended this conference
Research on what was aimed for at this conference and who was in charge of it

Topic 8

Vienna, July 1921
People who attended this conference
Research on what was aimed for at this conference and who was in charge of it

References

References

I noticed a number of references using the url to a Google Book link. I though editors might be interested in a tool which takes a link as input and creates a (usually) properly formatted ref.

Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books

I used it to improve two such references.

It really helps creates a much cleaner list of references. I hope you will try it. S Philbrick (Talk) 01:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding The Hague congress

I'll note this here for anyone intending to expand the article.

In a 1916 essay, Women and War, Agnes Repplier says, "When the women of France refused to participate in the International Congress of Women at The Hague, they defined their position in a document ...". This seems to put another spin on the reason for absence of the French delegates. The history.com article states that the French government "refused to allow delegates to attend the conference". A glance at some other sources suggests that the French group stated it is was unpatriotic, which accords with the position that Repplier was advancing. The second reference cited is to Addams Women at the Hague, a document that was first published in 1915 (not 2003, available here), and says the French understandably could not or would not attend. cygnis insignis 14:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]