Talk:International Chiropractors Association

Parochial

Where the article indicates that the majority of DC's find the "attitude parochial", the reference is to the majority (membership) association, which specifically includes the wording "therapeutic", for which the ICA is specifically "non-therapeutic". This includes all forms of physiotherapy, which is the essential difference between "straight" and "mixer".^Д-р_{СДжП,ДС} 21:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Chiropractors Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161230000000/http://data.memberclicks.com/site/ahc/ChiroHistoryPrimer.pdf to http://data.memberclicks.com/site/ahc/ChiroHistoryPrimer.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

dated links

There are several dated links that need to be cleaned up. They also seem to be included with statements that would be better suited for the discussion of controversy on the general chiropractic page. Pacmann117 (talk) 02:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

objective language

There are many instances of statements in this article which are clearly promoting an opinion. Additionally, these statements use vocabulary which the average reader would not be familiar with, such as "parochial". I have replaced this with objective language. While attempting to maintain the underlying though which appears to question why there are two major national chiropractic associations. Again, there is a general area for discussing the controversy of chiropractic on the general chiropractic page Pacmann117 (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Vaccine

There is sourced information about the views of the ICA on vaccinations. I recently added the information and a probable COI editor has reverted me. I am asking for additional eyes on the article and specifically about the information I added in.--VViking_TalkEdits 19:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested additional eyes on this article as I feel their anti-vaccine views should be included. If you invite Andrew Wakefield to your conference, even if the conference is only a subset of your organization, but one of your bigger conferences, you are clearly showing your bias towards anti-vaccine tendencies. As anti-vaccine is a fringe subject I feel this is an important aspect of the organization that should be included in their article. --VViking_TalkEdits 01:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also worth noting that the ICA website hosts the well know, but very cherry-picked antivax reference collection "1200 Studies" by Alan Palmer. I'm not sure that's worth noting on the main page, but it's another piece of evidence that would make it hard to argue that the organization doesn't support the Anti-vaccine movement.Nrjank (talk) 20:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]